- Joined
- Nov 22, 2010
- Messages
- 2,348
- Reaction score
- 144
Must have been born in 2013.
Maybe you need to read my post genius. The first two words were "Scoring aside". I was simply offering my opinion on the fight.That is not how boxing is scored, and if you want to go back in time 100 years, you may well be correct, in more civilised times, there are now limits to the amount of rounds that can be contested, which is also linked to the padding in the gloves, the damage fighters take and a bunch of other stuff.
Maybe you need to read up a little bit on boxing history
Maybe you need to read my post genius. The first two words were "Scoring aside". I was simply offering my opinion on the fight.
Maybe you need to read up a little bit on reading comprehension.
Yes, it's a loss on his record. Fortunately, boxing fans adapted to putting an asterisk next to bad decisions. Just another on the list.
It will be remembered by the community as boxing politics and serve as a testament, not a condemnation, of GGG's greatness.
professional boxing scores power. you would be thinking of amateur. one punch that causes significant damage out weights six that don't. that is why a knockdown equals a point off the score.Pretty much. Thats why I don't like fans who score power. If the bigger hitter lands a good shot, there's nothing the other guy can do to take back the round. Its shit judging.
No, it doesn't. It scores effective punching. Power is not one of the judging criteria. You can score a KD with a jab. A pitty pat jab can be an effective punch.professional boxing scores power. you would be thinking of amateur. one punch that causes significant damage out weights six that don't. that is why a knockdown equals a point off the score.