So not only does feminism cause 3rd world immigration, it also causes "culture loss, takeover, and conflict"? Yeah, when I saw the brand new account I kinda knew where this was heading.
Women should be able to decide that they want to work, and they should be able to decide whether or not they want to have children. That is called freedom, and it is absolutely a positive.
Regarding the claim expressed in the first paragraph, I didn’t say that. I spoke feminism and tech within society
leading to low birth rate and third world immigration (which is different from causing it), and that there are reasons to be concerned with that (culture loss, takeover, etc). I did not state that feminism caused culture loss, takeover, etc.
Regarding freedom, there are different kinds and they exist on something of a hierarchy. Freedom of indifference, the freedom you are herein relying on, is certainly a good, but it is only a good
so that we can have freedom for excellence. That is to say, this freedom is only a good so that we can choose those things which are good for us, and apart from that good, we misuse our freedom. (Why else would freedom be a good? That would just be license - there’s a decent article on this
https://www.firstthings.com/article/2002/03/a-better-concept-of-freedom)
So the question you should be asking is whether the good of women and the common good itself, is met, or at least not harmed, by women entering the workforce, using contraception, and so forth. That can’t be answered by saying “freedom is a positive.”