- Joined
- Mar 30, 2009
- Messages
- 28,721
- Reaction score
- 19,940
liberal logic. Assume liberals will steal so it's your fault tax payer.You can’t leave anything of value in your car and visible in any city anywhere.
liberal logic. Assume liberals will steal so it's your fault tax payer.You can’t leave anything of value in your car and visible in any city anywhere.
liberal logic. Assume liberals will steal so it's your fault tax payer.
Funny how these idiot psuedo journalists actually got their shit stolen while trying to seem righteous in setting up other people.
Poetic. They're idiots for leaving that shit without someone in the car. It's like they didnt know that block had a theft problem.
Sensitive snowflake. Tough on interwebzMaybe you should graduate the 5th grade and pull your uncle’s dick out of your ass before you try to lecture anyone. And since you uncle was asking, no, anal won’t make you pregnant.
Sensitive snowflake. Tough on interwebz
That's everyone's problemI think San Frans problem is a mixture of wealthy white liberal hipsters and poor white hippies tbh
It's all good. It got handled.Best post ITT. They literally just filmed someone breaking into their bait car but leave their actual car with all the good stuff completely unattended (for what looked like a much longer period of time).
Also fuck that sanctimonious cunt shitting on you for pointing out the hilarity of the situation.
I was in a 20 million person city with a population density twice that of SF. I dropped my wallet in the street and it was returned to me the next day by someone from a third world country working in a factory for $5/ hour. And that was considered normal. So, poverty is no excuse. Population is no excuse. Density is no excuse. This should not be happening.
Hicksville? While, yes much of the south and parts of the mid west are safe. There are many cities that smash and grabs are rare.Yeah, i’m sure you’re a real tough guy. You’re the one who got triggered by an innocuous comment that anyone who has ever lived anywhere but Hicksville knows is true.
the artificial restriction is a major cause for CA housing prices, but the prices are still dictated by what someone is willing to pay. If Chicago restricted development and rents skyrocketed everyone would simply move out. Why aren't San Franciscans moving out? Why do vacancies get filled immediately despite the prices? There are similarly high paying tech jobs all across America. You pay a premium just to live there and residents would rather step over homeless people on their way to work than live in flyover country.Housing is expensive because the supply is legally restricted, not because of a huge amount of demand. Chicago would be $3500 a studio if supply was restricted like that too.
There's warm weather year-round all over the USA but only a few places have problems like SF does. "The weather" is just a scapegoat.
They made Stanley Roberts leave.
yes, and the fact remains that they could be paying mortgage on a mansion in Texas for the prices they're paying to share a room in SF. This is testament to the high desirabilty of living in the Bay. So if it's such a shithole, why do people continue to pay so much to live there?I never said SF isn't awesome. It is.
But that 3500 studio rent is getting paid by San Franciscans earning under maybe 80 or 90K are living 2 to a room with a dude on the couch in the living room to afford it.