You Only have to look at all the different societies of the world and observe how different they are. To that end actually, if there's ever to be a limited govt/libertarian state its almost certainly going to be super majority white. Hell look at the free state project and New Hamshire. Why? Because it's a Caucasian cultural phenomenon, obviously not shared significantly by any other group. (And yes of course you're going to get outliers.)
So again, to the extent there's ever a libertarian like state it will functionally also be a white ethnostate (ethnocommmunity?) explicitly or otherwise.
You claim "dont bring outliers" yet reference a LARP project which comprises less than 10,000 individuals signed up?
Anarchism vs authoritarianism isnt certainly a caucasian phenomena, you can see if in the colonization of Mexico by the Spanish, the Aztecs were easy to pacify, once their rulers were defeated, it was merely a matter of replacing the head and elevating the local nobles to spanish nobility and replacing the local gods with christian saints, the Aztec people were already used to such social order.
Meanwhile as they moved north, they found troubles, the Chichimecas were semi-nomadic, so while they were used to empires, they were also used to not being ruled by a far away ruler, so they fought quite a bloody war to keep their way of life until they were converted to Christianity, since arms were not enough to pacify them.
The strategy of missionaries and trade allowed the Spanish to move north at a quick pace, until they found even more feral people like the Apaches which the Spanish could never pacify, these people resisted both arms and religion.
Even today, the only serious anarchist movements are 100% natives, while mestizos and white people who are used to modern civilization are content with the federal republic.
For example, Cheran, Michoacan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherá...d_the_transition_away_from_government_control
