- Joined
- Jun 8, 2009
- Messages
- 93,812
- Reaction score
- 14,430
the league could never support 8 new teams.
two or three at most.
Toronto
Oakland
San Antonio
two or three at most.
Toronto
Oakland
San Antonio
I meant the only city on that list that i quoted that made sense
London: the logistics of team travel would be a killer #1
Mexico city: wrong football
Oakland: historically unable to keep a franchise. How many times do the raiders have to leave before they realize that they're just an NFL side piece
You missed my second post where i said the league wouldnt be able to compete head to head against the football (soccer) season taking place at the same time.London wouldn't be as logistically difficult if you added 4 European teams. Mexico City has filled a football stadium for the Cowboys before, but the problem with putting a team in Mexico is that crime has gone through the roof in the past 15 years. It would be a risk for players and staff.
But i do agree that a euro division would make things easier
My picks:
Sacramento
Orlando
San Diego
Toronto
London
Barcelona
Frankfurt
Dusseldorf
You missed my second post where i said the league wouldnt be able to compete head to head against the football (soccer) season taking place at the same time.
But i do agree that a euro division would make things easier
also i would like to see detroit get a professional team
Someone already used Detroit for that joke, and it was way better that way.I feel like New York could use a football team. Also San Franciso should have a team.
The CFL would rather go out in a blaze of glory than sell out to the NFL.Just buy the CFL