That’s cool. Edits in Rockwell are really nice and clean to make things function a little better for the application. They’re also the only thing I trust for drive work.
Does your site use any GuardLogix 5000 for safety purposes? There are E&I/tech’s that hate it with the redundancy, but it really operates the same as regular 5000.
I freaking hate programming in Honeywell’s configuration studio for c300 though. Anything I do there, I know I could have done in a 5th of the time in Rockwell. And it’s 10x more complicated for guys to troubleshoot as it isn’t nice and linear like ladder logic as every single freaking device has their own control module and you have to jump around to different screens to get a handle on the flow and intent of the program
we dont use guardlogix cards, we use contact blocks that physically drop out the enables to our drives. . For some reason when we hire people to program the alarms for that, they have a habit of not labelling the bits so i get to play dumb little games figuring out where they go, and what the fuck happened. Naturally that portion of the program is safety locked so i cant add the fucking names afterward.
We do have a MUCH older program in the older part of the plant called SYMAX. Its a square D program from fucking 1984 running off DOS. Makes me feel like im in the matrix movies using it because it cant support actual tags, just numbers that referance things like IO or other rungs. Learn the important numbers after awhile and dont have to look them up. Studio is so much better its absurd though.