- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
- Messages
- 1,211
- Reaction score
- 118
Perhaps not the best place to post this, but I am sure you guys have life insurance. I've done my homework, but just curious what others have to say.
1. Parents are 60 and in decent health right now. Bought each a 25k whole life insurance policy. Nothing huge. Just to cover funeral expenses. I expect them to live for at least another 20 years. Currently paying $220/month total for both policies.
2. Sister just joined Primerica and she said Term life is better. She is able to get a 15 year (20 yr not available for people 60+) term life (25k each) for around $100/month. And since I am already willing to pay $220 for whole life, I can take the $120 and invest it. According to her, $120 invested over 15 yrs at a interest rate of 5-9%, I would accumulate around $40-50k.
My main problem here:
- If my parents live pass the 15 year term, which I think they will, the policy is done and renewing would be extremely costly. Accumulating 40-50k over 15 years is not a guaranteed. If I somehow landed in the 30k or under when my parents pass away, I'm screw. Yes, I will be paying more than 50k for the whole life policy if my parents pass away at 80+, but 50k is guaranteed no matter what. I don't think about how much I've paid over the years, but what I'm guaranteed at the moment.
So why is she trying to convince me that the term life + investment is a better idea? Seems to me like, term life policies were created to lapse just before the insured dies and that is why my parents do no qualify for a 20 yr term. If I need to invest extra just to cover my ass then the whole life makes sense. Who's the say the stock market will not crash to the ground on the 14th year from now?
1. Parents are 60 and in decent health right now. Bought each a 25k whole life insurance policy. Nothing huge. Just to cover funeral expenses. I expect them to live for at least another 20 years. Currently paying $220/month total for both policies.
2. Sister just joined Primerica and she said Term life is better. She is able to get a 15 year (20 yr not available for people 60+) term life (25k each) for around $100/month. And since I am already willing to pay $220 for whole life, I can take the $120 and invest it. According to her, $120 invested over 15 yrs at a interest rate of 5-9%, I would accumulate around $40-50k.
My main problem here:
- If my parents live pass the 15 year term, which I think they will, the policy is done and renewing would be extremely costly. Accumulating 40-50k over 15 years is not a guaranteed. If I somehow landed in the 30k or under when my parents pass away, I'm screw. Yes, I will be paying more than 50k for the whole life policy if my parents pass away at 80+, but 50k is guaranteed no matter what. I don't think about how much I've paid over the years, but what I'm guaranteed at the moment.
So why is she trying to convince me that the term life + investment is a better idea? Seems to me like, term life policies were created to lapse just before the insured dies and that is why my parents do no qualify for a 20 yr term. If I need to invest extra just to cover my ass then the whole life makes sense. Who's the say the stock market will not crash to the ground on the 14th year from now?