Correct. But Diaz holds the weight better and was much bigger than Conor. You're whining about Conor's size advantage over the FW's, so lets keep the debate consistent.
You said he looked 'good' I'd say he looked very, very good. His distance management and the 4 punch combo were not something you see in MMA often. It was Silva-esque how accurate he was, too.
Brah, don't even get started on that. The threads on here on who had the better boxing was almost as tedious as the 'Who is P4P best?' threads.
Cool.
I wouldn't say he got crushed. If that was a fighter getting crushed, then I feel you must have some bias against Conor. There was some back and forth in the Conor and Diaz fight. Alvarez looked out of his element after that 1st knockdown. So to call Conor being crushed by Diaz and looking good against Alvarez is a bit daft.
But styles make fights. Conor landed some big shots on Diaz and blew his wad - that's not taking anything away from Diaz - Conor underestimated him and paid for it. The 2nd fight played out differently and we seen that Conor had the better striking.
If you're a wrestler with good BJJ, it's more than likely going to be 30-27 or 50-45 on the scorecards. Look at Ferguson, he lost to Johnson and is now on a tear. And if you want to bring up injuries during that fight, I can bring up some issues with Conor before the 1st Diaz fight. Shit happens in training camps and during fights, so they're never going to be 100%
And Diaz handled Johnson pretty handily in their fight, but that's going down the MMAth route which means fuck all.