- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
- Messages
- 9,279
- Reaction score
- 0
We departed from objectivity when we started comparing unlike parts.
They are not unlike, simply not the exact same parts.
Piracy is not the same as legally purchased software. Ditching the cost of the OS is one of those "tricks" you can use at the custom builder sites like CPPC & IBP.
It's not piracy when you can download from Microsoft and use it without any extra means. At most you are violating their terms of service, which is not illegal.
If they're just going to buy a cheaper refurb again in 5 years I doubt they'd care. The point of this buy isn't upgradeability or reuseability. It's viable gaming power under $400.
They may not care, I would argue they should as the majority of those that get into PC gaming look to continue or up grade, however that is up to them to decide.
You aren't fairly weighing each choice. Where does the ability to upgrade come from in your build? The Case and PSU, of course. Those cost $65 in your build. So I could literally purchase them, sit on them, and also have them for a future build while still beating your cost by $85 (once you add the 500GB HDD and scdkey...beat it by $50 without them). Your dogmatic devotion to building has caused you to overlook these simple considerations while scrambling to argue better value.
Are probably not worth ~$150 premium to most buyers on a $400 purchase.
- The ability to upgrade the GPU 1x (R3-1200 bottlenecks beyond the GTX 1070)
- Case & PSU can be recycled towards new build
- Overclockable (which voids warranty)
- DDR4 RAM > DDR3 RAM
You could buy the case and PSU and just sit on them. However most people don't want to do that. In the end I would say those 4 you listed are pretty good reasons to spend an extra $150 dollars. There is a reason most people looking to build a PC wait until they have a larger budget then $400. It's the same reason most people are looking for cases with windows and simple better aesthetics, like PSUs without ketchup and mustard cables.