Why is selling weapons different then selling oil, if we don't do it, won't someone else?

Duh, again, no. Who financed Hitler? Please, go down that rabbit hole. I dare you.


Not at all to "the Jewish people," but which neo-conservatives lied us into Iraq? Go down that rabbit hole if you dare.
Eh, I know a lot of neocons are jews, it's not a secret, but the jews/the rothschilds/the fed, didn't finance hitler. The NSDAP got in power through low budget means. They had rallies, some printing presses and word of mouth. Some rich germans donated some money but back in 1933 you didn't need millions to win an election, TV wasn't that big of a deal. In fact, they didn't even win an election, they just got a lot of seats and were able to stage a soft coup.
After that he had the entire german economy in his hands.
 
. 02/2001 = 7,088 barrels of oil from Iraq
. 10/2001 = 36,501 barrels
. 04/2018 = 25,006 barrels

Not just oil, but control and influence in the region. Plus Iraq had already invaded Kuwait once. As of June, 2016, according to the U.S. Department of Defense, there were a total of 4,424 American casualties in Iraq.

The financial costs for getting the oil still does not make sense. Oil is a commodity meaning it does not matter for each grade of oil you get besides transportation costs. At any moment of time there is a market clearing price for commodities.
 
The financial costs for getting the oil still does not make sense. Oil is a commodity meaning it does not matter for each grade of oil you get besides transportation costs. At any moment of time there is a market clearing price for commodities.

You have to think in terms of individual profit.

If you figure out who is individually profiting cough*genie energy/haliburton*cough, you can see who the architects of war are.
 
The same point as all the other times. Did the logic not digest? What part of what I wrote do you not understand?



I don't know what is going on. I'm sorry to say, but you have been posting some pretty stupid questions lately.



Who do you think financed Hitler? Not Hitler but the Nazi regime. You are mixing apples and oranges. One is the wealth of an individual (rich people), the other is the wealth involved behind a movement. Well it wasn't the Jews, even though their wealth was taken away for use by the Nazis. The Germans financed the Third Reich. All Germans, rich and poor. Government taxation, nationalization, and trade. German money built the German war machine, Hitler just pointed the German people in that direction.



What are you saying? The Jews financed the rise of the Nazi regime in the 1930s? You of all people should know that part of history. How strong was the Jewish influence in German banking in the 1930s?
415glB0uDZL._SX302_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

"Private currency speculators caused the German mark to plummet, precipitating one of the worst runaway inflations in modern times. A wheelbarrow full of 100 billion-mark banknotes could not buy a loaf of bread. The national treasury was empty. Countless homes and farms were lost to speculators and to private (Jewish controlled) banks. Germans lived in hovels. They were starving."

"Nothing like this had ever happened before - the total destruction of the national currency, plus the wiping out of people's savings and businesses. On top of this came a global depression. Germany had no choice but to succumb to debt slavery under international (mainly Jewish) bankers until 1933, when the National Socialists came to power. At that point the German government thwarted the international banking cartels by issuing its own money. World Jewry responded by declaring a global boycott against Germany."

"Hitler began a national credit program by devising a plan of public works that included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities. All these were paid for with money that no longer came from the private international bankers."
Not bad, not bad, but a few blanks there, no? Yes, we are talking about the financing of the nazi war machine that might have defeated the world.

Obviously, the central bankers were involved on both sides. Although he did, Hitler couldn't just print money forever, he knew it, they all did. And while that story worked well for the masses, the truth was that there was one very influential family involved as a direct banking conduit to Hitler even after Americans had been dying in that war.

Prescott Bush, who was rewarded for his work as he became the Senator of NY. His son became President and even his dumbass grandson sat on our throne.

Look it up. The US government took at least three companies from him under the Trading with the Enemy Act for financing Hitler!

These leftist idiots run around today whining about "literally Hitler," when literal nazis have already sat on our throne... and there was near absolute silence from both the left and the right.
 
Iran's vast natural resources being served in a silver platter to China after the US strongarmed everyone not to work with Iran? Who could have guessed.
 
Yes, we are talking about the financing of the nazi war machine that might have defeated the world. Obviously, the central bankers were involved on both sides. Although he did, Hitler couldn't just print money forever, he knew it, they all did.

Well, here is the interesting thing about Hitler, the Nazis, and the Third Reich. Had the Germans not invaded Poland and started WWII, Hitler would have been hailed as a hero and Germany would have thrived for years. Hitler did bring Germany out of the depression and turned it into a very powerful nation. Austria and Northern Czechoslovakia had German roots and welcomed the German occupation. Austria literally rolled out the 'red carpet' when the Germans crossed their border. The world would not have gone to war and, again, Hitler would have gone down in history as a hero.

Well, Hitler fucked up. He was a product of WWI and deep resentment. He felt Germany was humiliated at the end of WWI. He hated France for what they did to Germany. His need for redemption from Europe outpaced his desire for a successful Germany. He should have stopped after Czechoslovakia, but he didn't.
 
as long as they aren't secretly selling, i.e. Fast and Furious or Iran Contra then I don't have a problem w/ it

Ideally, I wish the US would stay out of most world affairs, including arming shit tier countries, but that's not the reality we live in
 
Back
Top