Why Tillerson called Trump a Moron - Stated he wanted 10x Nuke increase during Nat Security Meeting

"HAHA I JUST MADE UP A BUNCH OF THINGS THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN! YOU SURE LOOK SILLY NOW"
The point went right over your head you fuckin mouth breather. It's funny how both you and heretic refuse to answer the questions. Yeah, no shit they're fucking made up. The whole point was to create a litmus test to gauge where drumpf dickriders would finally condemn his behavior.
 
The point went right over your head you fuckin mouth breather. It's funny how both you and heretic refuse to answer the questions. Yeah, no shit they're fucking made up. The whole point was to create a litmus test to gauge where drumpf dickriders would finally condemn his behavior.

What if Trump pooped his pants on live tv, and then screamed the n-word before hitting the nuclear launch button and destroying the EU. Boy, Trump voters would look soooooo dumb then XD
 
What if Trump pooped his pants on live tv, and then screamed the n-word before hitting the nuclear launch button and destroying the EU. Boy, Trump voters would look soooooo dumb then XD

Nah, you'd still rationalize it some how. "He has the best poop in his pants! Ask anyone! Oh the n-word is just a word, what's the big deal? The EU needed some freedom anyway!"
 
What if Trump pooped his pants on live tv, and then screamed the n-word before hitting the nuclear launch button and destroying the EU. Boy, Trump voters would look soooooo dumb then XD

@Der Eisbar has the greatest arguments. The best...

Let me ask you this:
How would you feel if an alien species came down, enslaved all of humanity, put us all in cages and lived off of eating us? They're the "superior" and more intelligent species right? So that alone would justify it, right?
 
What if Trump pooped his pants on live tv, and then screamed the n-word before hitting the nuclear launch button and destroying the EU. Boy, Trump voters would look soooooo dumb then XD
So answer your own made up scenario: if he did what you described, would you denounce him?

also lmfao @ comparing screaming the n word on tv while hitting the nuke button to something that is completely plausible: the russian dossier being true.
 
@Der Eisbar has the greatest arguments. The best...

You must be eating those trump steaks. Probably why both you and your Fuhrer have declining mental capacity.

Generating hypothetical situations to establish principles is not an argument. How do you not understand that?
 
Question: Hypothetically, if this were real, what would be your opinion on Trump wanting to up our nuclear arsenal "tenfold" ? And if it isn't real, then why did Trump jokingly challenge Tillerson to an IQ test?

I don't really see the issue with him wanting to increase the nuclear arsenal. Increasing and decreasing nuclear arsenals is nothing more than political posturing IMO. We already have enough nukes to destroy this world countless times. Like having more then that is going to make a difference.

My main issue with it is it's a waste of money.
 
On topic, this sounds exactly like the type of reasoning Trump would employ. He's an impossibly shitty President, and a completely narcissistic buffoon.
 
I don't really see the issue with him wanting to increase the nuclear arsenal. Increasing and decreasing nuclear arsenals is nothing more than political posturing IMO. We already have enough nukes to destroy this world countless times. Like having more then that is going to make a difference.

Pretty sure that's why the military was confused and Tillerson used the moron phrase. We have more than we'll ever need, so whats the point in increasing it "tenfold".

My main issue with it is it's a waste of money.

So you do see *some* issue with him wanting to increase the nuclear arsenal :p
 
On topic, this sounds exactly like the type of reasoning Trump would employ. He's an impossibly shitty President, and a completely narcissistic buffoon.

We need a definitive megathread to categorize all the conservative posters on the war room. We need to do the research, a poll, whatever, and generate 3 categories: conservatives that never supported trump, conservatives that supported trump initially but have realized what a dangerous moron he is, and conservative sub humans like heretic that still support him. All posters in the last category go on the ignore list.
 
Me:

"An anonymous source from a Liberal outlet is not trustworthy"



Butthurt Libs:

"You're Canadian!"

"Shut up Canadian!"

"If Trump reanimated Hitler's corpse and put him in power, you'd still support him! Canadian!!!"



LOL.

Good talk, guys.

Oh, please.

You’ve shown yourself to be a Trump sycophant completely lacking in objectivity. That’s the reason anything you post is rightfully discounted.

It doesn’t matter to me what nationality a poster is, as long as they refrain from trolling and are able to make constructive arguments and be objective.

The truth is, your posts are rarely worth more than a dismissive “silly Canadian!” response.
 
We now know why Tillerson called Trump a fucking moron and it has nothing to do with his hyper politicized speech to at the Boy Scouts of America annual jamboree. It's because he wanted to expand the American Nuclear Capabilities 10-fold and sprung this idea on a surprised staff outta nowhere and doesn't understand or doesn't care about the ramifications of doing it.

Trump Wanted Tenfold Increase in Nuclear Arsenal, Surprising Military

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said he wanted what amounted to a nearly tenfold increase in the U.S. nuclear arsenal during a gathering this past summer of the nation’s highest ranking national security leaders, according to three officials who were in the room.


Trump’s comments, the officials said, came in response to a briefing slide he was shown that charted the steady reduction of U.S. nuclear weapons since the late 1960s. Trump indicated he wanted a bigger stockpile, not the bottom position on that downward-sloping curve.


According to the officials present, Trump’s advisers, among them the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, were surprised. Officials briefly explained the legal and practical impediments to a nuclear buildup and how the current military posture is stronger than it was at the height of the build-up. In interviews, they told NBC News that no such expansion is planned.


The July 20 meeting was described as a lengthy and sometimes tense review of worldwide U.S. forces and operations. It was soon after the meeting broke up that officials who remained behind heard Tillerson say that Trump is a “moron.”
...
Officials present said that Trump’s comments on a significantly increased arsenal came in response to a briefing slide that outlined America’s nuclear stockpile over the past 70 years. The president referenced the highest number on the chart — about 32,000 in the late 1960s — and told his team he wanted the U.S. to have that many now, officials said.


The U.S. currently has around 4,000 nuclear warheads in its military stockpile, according to the Federation of American Scientists.

The Pentagon is currently undergoing the long-planned posture review. Modernizing the arsenal is a step presidents continuously take that doesn’t put the U.S. in violation of treaty obligations, Cirincione said.

“You don’t get in trouble for modernizing. You do get in trouble if you do one of two things: if you increase the numbers. The strategic weapons are treaty limited. Two, if you build a new type of weapon that is prohibited by a treaty,” he said.
Actually it might not have been Trump's desire for a 10x increase in nukes as that was only one of many moronic statements he made during the many hour long meeting -


It’s unclear which portion of the Pentagon briefing prompted Tillerson to call the president a “moron” after the meeting broke up and some advisers were gathered around. Officials who attended the two-hour session said it included a number of tense exchanges.

At one point, Trump responded to a presentation on the U.S. military presence in South Korea by asking why South Koreans aren’t more appreciative and welcoming of American defense aid. The comment prompted intervention from a senior military official in the room to explain the overall relationship and why such help is ultimately beneficial to U.S. national security interests.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...lear-arsenal-meeting-military-leaders-n809701

Trump_riding_bomb.jpg
I really hope that isn't true and he doesn't actually want a 10x increase in nuclear weapons. But sad to say that it probably is, and I'm sure he's hoping for a chance to use them
 
does that mean he is mentally unstable? wow...just wow.
His mental disorder. (NPD). Clearly pushes him to use emotion over common sense and intellect when making decisions.
 
Pretty sure that's why the military was confused and Tillerson used the moron phrase. We have more than we'll ever need, so whats the point in increasing it "tenfold".



So you do see *some* issue with him wanting to increase the nuclear arsenal :p

Yea the money thing is my main issue but the issue can pretty much be applied across the board to every politician in our history.
 
1) We used to have 32,000 nuclear weapons. We now have only 4,000. So, this isn't an absurd thing to ask if you saw that chart.

2) More "anonymous sources"? Come on..
 
1) We used to have 32,000 nuclear weapons. We now have only 4,000. So, this isn't an absurd thing to ask if you saw that chart.

2) More "anonymous sources"? Come on..
Id expect our president who allegedly has the best brain and best words to be smart enough to understand that even a handful of nuclear detonations would doom our species, meaning having 32000 weapons is unnecessary
 
Back
Top