We'll go with the alternate judge and I'll post the thread in a second. Both opening statements are in.
Dang, that's the only one I'd be interested and confident enough to take on(against if it isn't obvious from my posting history). Oh well, sounds like too much work for me anyway.
Anything not dealt with in that list that interests you?
Like I said, none of them are topics I'd be interested or confident enough in taking on and on virtually all of them there is probably a poster on this forum better suited for it. On 10 I would argue against but @Jack V Savage would do a far better job of taking on that. I'm also against an assault weapons bans but there are probably a few gun nut posters here like @Cubo de Sangre who know the ins and outs of firearms and firearm legislation better than I so he'd argue that position better.
Ahhhh that's a good idea. Transgender issues could have some great potential. I'd be specifically curious how people argue enforcement.
Honestly if @m52nickerson let me take his place I think I could do very well. He already had a chance at a debate but at the same time he got first dibs and the rules are the rules.
This is all pretty flexible so you might be able to work something out.
I tagged him so we'll see what he thinks.
Cool cool
You can find the rules/procedures linked in the current debate thread sticky, in the OP. I'm cool debating boots on the ground w/you or m52nickerson, whatever you guys decide, I think either way the conversation will be worthwhile. Probably toward end of the month is best.
