- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
- Messages
- 34,003
- Reaction score
- 12,324
Moral posturing by shaming the other person for their beliefs. Normal lib tactic.
I'm not a liberal.
Nice try though.
Moral posturing by shaming the other person for their beliefs. Normal lib tactic.
You're welcomeI used to avoid the OT like the plague, now I'm in love.
Regardless, there's nothing immoral about being opposed to gay marriage so try another argument that doesn't involve calling others bigots.I'm not a liberal.
Nice try though.
Regardless, there's nothing immoral about being opposed to gay marriage so try another argument that doesn't involve calling others bigots.
To be honest, bigot is not a term I would shy away from based on the google definition, but it does bother me based on the history of the word and how I associate it with racism. I'm not 'tolerant' (I'm curious to know how exactly intolerance is defined because though I may disagree with someone I support their right to free speech) to other view points on this matter as well as other issues, but many other people of different backgrounds, ethnicities, and political views could accurately be labeled a bigot. I don't like the term because of all the negative connotations associated with it, but based on the definition: "a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions" you're as much of a bigot as he is unless you are 'tolerant' to his viewpoint.OP offered absolutely zero evidence that suggests that legalizing gay marriage marriage would "open the door" to other types of marriage.
Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the opposition stems from bigotry rather than any logical conclusions therein.
To be honest, bigot is not a term I would shy away from based on the google definition, but it does bother me based on the history of the word and how I associate it with racism. I'm not 'tolerant' (I'm curious to know how exactly intolerance is defined because though I may disagree with someone I support their right to free speech) to other view points on this matter as well as other issues, but many other people of different backgrounds, ethnicities, and political views could accurately be labeled a bigot. I don't like the term because of all the negative connotations associated with it, but based on the definition: "a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions" you're as much of a bigot as he is unless you are 'tolerant' to his viewpoint.
I guess my point or question is, how exactly do you mean bigot?
Lol I cracked up at the insect comment.
"The big difference between sex for money and sex for free is that sex for money usually costs a lot less."1. What other forms of marriage are you worried about? Human and animal? Just define marriage as a contract between 2 humans. Pretty simple.
2. Marriage is a legal form of prostitution, just much more expensive. You have to give a person half of what you own to have sex with them.
Not allowed to change my beliefs.Have you garnered a new perspective recently? There are some beliefs or opinions I thought would be difficult for me to change my mind on, but I've recently been exposed to some experiences and information that made me rethink my stance.
1. I was vehemently pro-gay marriage for a long time.
I personally don't it's my business whatever consenting adults do.I always thought of marriage as being a solely a matter for the individuals involved and that government and the rest of society should stay out of it. But I realize now that when it comes to marriage, it has to be a legal issue. Legalizing gay marriage would open the doors for other forms of marriage and that could lead to an administrative nightmare. It would be very confusing to figure that shit out and keeping the legal definition of marriage as being between man and woman would make things a lot more simpler. I'm still all about the rights of gay people being equal to everybody else, but I am not sure where I stand on the issue of marriage now.
2. I was always against going to prostitutes.
I've always been for legalizing it, but I personally didn't want to go to prostitutes myself. My first experience with one years ago was very empty and forgettable. The girl was average looking and she was almost too professional; everything was very mechanical and "by the book." I wondered why anybody would pay for sex when it would be much better to simply hit on a girl at a bar for a one night stand. And personally, sex in itself isn't all that meaningful for me unless I have some emotional connection with a girl I know. However, these days I find myself caring less about emotional connection with women unless the girl is truly special, which is rare. Hitting on women feels like too much work these days not to mention I don't have as much time anymore. Not to mention some chicks are fucking crazy and can bring drama to your life. Also I don't want a relationship anyway. But if I do get horny, going to a prostitute seems like an easy and simple alternative without the hassle of trying to hit on a girl and establishing a no-strings attached fwb arrangement without her getting clingy and hurt.
Has anybody else had recent changes in opinion?
I was pretty lax on immigration and didn't care about borders. After seeing what is happening in Europe, I'm not so sure anymore. It seems like the ideology of a lot of the immigrants (not all) are just not compatible with where they are migrating to.
#1 is fallacious reasoning. But that's not your fault, there just aren't any sound arguments for opposing same sex marriage.