- Joined
- Mar 7, 2006
- Messages
- 43,761
- Reaction score
- 2,855
For a lesson in reading comprehension go back and read my posts. I never once said there was no value on betting Elkins you are making shit up. I don't blame anyone for betting Elkins at those odds. What i was pointing out is loads of people were justifying betting Elkins cos he gave Skelly a lopsided whooping and Bektic didn't. That means absolutely jack shit. That's like me saying i am betting Bektic cos he destroyed Martins and Elkins had to cage hug.
With regards to Ferg Tibau which you keep bringing up. Normally I completely disregard MMA math. But when you have a scenario where Ferg has smashed up three people who Kebab beat but IMO in completely less empathetic fashion than Ferg, I think there is some merit to considering that when capping this fight.
This post is just ridiculous on all levels. Again, you throw out a strawman due to your lack of reading comprehension. Where did I say that you said "there was no value on betting Elkins". Honestly, how do you even get that from the post you quoted? And you say I'm making shit up? Lol. The point of the post is that there is validity to talking about Bektic vs. Skelly as Skelly is the most similar opponent to Elkins and Bektic's toughest test. Elkins vs. Skelly is relevant because it shows one of the countless examples of Elkins playing spoiler as the underdog and excelling against the same level of competition that Bektic has faced. Not that hard to comprehend.
As for your second paragraph, here is the translation: MMA math only works when I use it. I also like how you conveniently disregard their 4th common opponent.