'white nuclear family' promotes white supremacy, says New York professor

Keep moving that goal post. You ought to recognize the pattern and realize we will continue to see this sentiment permeate through academia. What will you say to the next professor, and the one after that, and so on...

What goalpost? you are the one who claims it is mainstream.
 
What goalpost? you are the one who claims it is mainstream.
He's not saying it's mainstream. He's saying it is in academia.

My guess is that this anti-white and anti-family sentiment is more common among homosexuals and in academia like this woman.



http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...nfairly-disadvantaging-others-katherine-timpf

Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others

According to a professor at the University of Warwick in England, parents who read to their kids should be thinking about how they’re “unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children” by doing so. In an interview with ABC Radio last week, philosopher and professor Adam Swift said that since “bedtime stories activities . . . do indeed foster and produce . . . [desired] familial relationship goods,” he wouldn’t want to ban them, but that parents who “engage in bedtime-stories activities” should definitely at least feel kinda bad about it sometimes:

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...nfairly-disadvantaging-others-katherine-timpf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's not saying it's mainstream. He's saying it is in academia.

My guess is that this anti-white and anti-family sentiment is more common among homosexuals and in academia like this woman.



I know 2 married lesbian couples that are raising kids in a monogamous relationships and they are also religious. The woman is fat and bitter, thats to be expected of said peple

Social sciences will always have fringe views, that doesnt makes them mainstream.

If gay people are so much against, marriage i wonder why have they fought so hard for the right to marry. And if conservatives are in favor of marriage, why have they opposed the right to marry for many groups.
 
I know 2 married lesbian couples that are raising kids in a monogamous relationships and they are also religious. The woman is fat and bitter, thats to be expected of said peple

Social sciences will always have fringe views, that doesnt makes them mainstream.
Like I said, we aren't making the point that it's mainstream. You're arguing against something you made up.
 
I know 2 married lesbian couples that are raising kids in a monogamous relationships and they are also religious. The woman is fat and bitter, thats to be expected of said peple

Social sciences will always have fringe views, that doesnt makes them mainstream.

If gay people are so much against, marriage i wonder why have they fought so hard for the right to marry. And if conservatives are in favor of marriage, why have they opposed the right to marry for many groups.


"married", also "monogamous" implies there is sex going on.
 
Fat ugly and undesirable menopausal white lady comes to terms with never having children or a family by arguing that having children and a family is evil and racist if you're white.

Some Somalian will bang her.
 
Like I said, we aren't making the point that it's mainstream. You're arguing against something you made up.

He claimed that this proves its just not lone nutters, it doesnt.
 
sounds to me like she is just (inadvertently) showing how much impact being raised in a two parent household and not leeching off the SW Safety Net can have
 
Last edited:
Lesbian couples normally stop even attempting a simulacra of sexual activity after six months.

Long term lesbian couples are almost all completely celibate.
 
Gotta keep that white anxiety high if you want the taxpayers to hand over their cash.



Is she really a professor somewhere and allowed to teach this? If not, you're free to point out the oversight.
 
He claimed that this proves its just not lone nutters, it doesnt.
They are out there. And it's more than just one. I just gave 2 examples of it. That doesn't mean it's mainstream. Like I said, it's probably mostly the homosexuals in academia that are angry at the family structure.
 
What goalpost? you are the one who claims it is mainstream.

No, I simply reminded the forum of how left wing posters were insisting that the BLM lady was a single marginal nutter. She is not alone as was claimed and now she has company in academia.
 
This is the new left....

What's even more comical is that white leftists and white leftists here probably support such an idiotic notion.
No. This is a moron.

Morons have always existed. They come in a great variety of religious and political persuasions.

Thanks for playing "Let's Divide the Country Based Absurdly Asinine Generalizations!" though. You're today's champ.
 
A career-driven lesbian who's hiding from the real world by working in Academia, has negative feelings about the nuclear family?

Color me shocked!
 
A career-driven lesbian who's hiding from the real world by working in Academia, has negative feelings about the nuclear family?

Color me shocked!
If they'd let me into that college it would be fun to take her class! You too.

That would be fun times!
 
tenor.gif
Lol
 
No, I simply reminded the forum of how left wing posters were insisting that the BLM lady was a single marginal nutter. She is not alone as was claimed and now she has company in academia.

Now she has company? there have always been nutters in social sciences. Thats why nobody takes those seriously.

Except of course right wingers looking for outrage porn, thanks to social media you end up seeing these nutters speak out loud.

I had a 100% communist professor in college who was like hearing Maduro speak in a common core (dont know if its the right term) course. Im pretty sure that a few nutters in irrelevant courses arent changing the world.
 
Lesbian couples normally stop even attempting a simulacra of sexual activity after six months.

Long term lesbian couples are almost all completely celibate.

Gotcha, didnt knew that.
 
Back
Top