that's because American law is not an eye for an eye. i'm just going by what i was taught about it. i went to Catholic school, so maybe they exaggerated to give more credence to 'forgive your enemies.'That is indeed, an incredibly stupid misunderstanding of the concept. If you kill someone, you get killed; that would be an application of eye for an eye. Murder is the crime in question, not "murder of someone's relative". If you break someone's nose under American law, for instance, you pay damages to him; your brother doesn't pay damages to his brother because you both have brothers, or something.
Everyone ends up blind .
I don't believe in an eye for an eye. I believe in 2 eyes for an eye.Everyone ends up blind .
You should stick to shitty political commentary. Medicine isn't your thing.An eye for eye...that's how cancer starts.
that's because American law is not an eye for an eye. i'm just going by what i was taught about it. i went to Catholic school, so maybe they exaggerated to give more credence to 'forgive your enemies.'
yeah i realize that now. i went on a google search for quotes about relatives being killed, no hits!No, the fact that American law is not eye for an eye has nothing to do with that, because it doesn't work like that under eye for an eye either. I didn't go to a Catholic school, but I went to a Catholic church and sunday school, and I'm shocked that the Biblical commandment of "eye for an eye" was so grossly misrepresented to you.
To be absolutely clear, the Bible says, "Thou shalt give life for life, eye for eye, foot for foot, burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe", but it is the life or eye of the perpetrator, not one of the perpetrator's family members.
okay i found this @Beta Wolf https://maptia.com/stefanoschirato/stories/eye-for-an-eye
Northern Albania has an eye for an eye unwritten law. it involves being allowed to kill another person's family member if they killed one of yours.
well ghandi slept with kids so gonna have to side with bas.Bas Rutten > Ghandi
It's the way stuff was done for thousands of years, and it was silly. It's one of the direct reasons Western Civilization has evolved into what it is, a system of objective laws and non retribution based punishment.
We have non-retribution-based punishment? When did they get rid of prisons?
If you think prison is retribution based, you should look at some of the other modes of punishment around the world.
I didn't say "more retribution-based than all other modes of punishment around the world".
I don't think they chop of hands or other extremities in Prison, do they?
I didn't say "more retribution-based than all other modes of punishment around the world".