F
franklinstower
Guest
I think what would help this situation most is to get rid of encumbering governmental regulations that keep corporations from making more profits.
And if you read the first sentence in the post you quoted, coupled with the actual examples I gave, then were sitting right back here on my side on the fenceI know all about gas in wells, I've lost friends and family to well explosions. I drive by flares every day. If you go back up, I said derailed trains tend to go boom.
# 1 terrorist (for committing acts of violence and damage)is leftist groupsI would not be surprised if it was sabotage by enviro wackos.
If you transport liquids, leaks will happen. I wonder if those protesters had a viable alternative to meet our needs for energy until we do go green. I'm willing to bet the answer is no.
Several trains carrying the same oil derailed and spilled while the pipeline was stalled during the obama administration and it hardly made the news
'210k Gallons' sounds like alot more than '2,100 Barrels.'
And I just looked up the capacity of these oil tanks being transported by commercial trucks on interstates -
- 11,600 gallons.
So the total amount of oil that was leaked was enough to fill 18.1 oil tanks.
Just another example of environmentalists trying to make a Mt Everest out of a mole hill.
TruePipelines not being the absolute worse way to transport oil does not in any way let this oil company off the hook for making a shitty pipe.
This pipeline was built in 2010. There's pipes 5 decades older built with much less tech that don't leak. They cut corners, designed poorly, or didn't properly engineer and build this section...more than likely to save cost.
It seems they need oversight so they do better but this administration are cucks for corporate interest so it won't happen.
Pipelines not being the absolute worse way to transport oil does not in any way let this oil company off the hook for making a shitty pipe.
This pipeline was built in 2010. There's pipes 5 decades older built with much less tech that don't leak. They cut corners, designed poorly, or didn't properly engineer and build this section...more than likely to save cost.
It seems they need oversight so they do better but this administration are cucks for corporate interest so it won't happen.
Do you use motor oil for lube when taking it from the oil exec paying you to make that post?
'210k Gallons' sounds like alot more than '2,100 Barrels.'
And I just looked up the capacity of these oil tanks being transported by commercial trucks on interstates -
- 11,600 gallons.
So the total amount of oil that was leaked was enough to fill 18.1 oil tanks.
Just another example of environmentalists trying to make a Mt Everest out of a mole hill.
You are right man, I personally think pipelines is the way to transport oil but these morons (job creators) who are making record profits always cutting corners to save pennies. Regulation and oversight is a must on this stuff, is that really too much to ask.Pipelines not being the absolute worse way to transport oil does not in any way let this oil company off the hook for making a shitty pipe.
This pipeline was built in 2010. There's pipes 5 decades older built with much less tech that don't leak. They cut corners, designed poorly, or didn't properly engineer and build this section...more than likely to save cost.
It seems they need oversight so they do better but this administration are cucks for corporate interest so it won't happen.
Look at the mound on the leftYes, and not just for lube...
That's why they didn't use barrels. Gallons are smaller.
No, using gallons makes it seem like its 100 times worse.
Translation - Its not a big deal.
More motor oil leaks out of shitty engines on the interestates for the entire United States in a month, than was leaked in this spill.
No, using gallons makes it seem like its 100 times worse.