- Joined
- Aug 11, 2007
- Messages
- 46,285
- Reaction score
- 27,474
Does she have a bathtub tattoo?This is the difference.
Dafuq?
Does she have a bathtub tattoo?This is the difference.
You're not? I think you can see why some of us might assume so since you are a leftist and, well, there's your username. I thought you were and I'm not using commie as a pejorative, just thought you were a sincere communist.
If not a communist, how would you describe yourself?
With a brickWouldn't be proud of it but I'd hit it.
Where the fuck have you been the last 36 hours? His work in the immigration thread is much more impressive than that.This is a disappointingly shitty post from you.
"socialist"If not a communist, how would you describe yourself?
Where the fuck have you been the last 36 hours? His work in the immigration thread is much more impressive than that.
Ah I see, I figured it was something like that.Well, the thing is that "communist" is an incredibly complex term, historically speaking, and it just so happens that most of the people who use the word have no concept of what they are implying. I usually try to explain the term as having two different meanings: a meaning that shoots from ideology and a meaning that shoots from status as an historical artifact of the 20th century.
Originally, the term "communist" would have referred to a person following the dictates of Marx's Communist Manifesto, which was more of an abbreviated call to arms than the more detailed political and economic framework that he would build in subsequent works. To that extent, yes, I'm a Marxist.
However, following the October Revolution, the rise of Leninism and the eventual commandeering of the revolutionary government by Stalin towards Stalinism, "communism" and the Stalin-termed "Marxism-Leninism" were stark departures from Marx. Likewise, most all "communist" revolutions in the subsequent decades followed the Leninist-Stalinist path in seizing state control. The Soviets and the US were both absolutely willing to affirmatively conflate socialism and communism with the brutal Soviet machine, and, since then, "communist" as a social artifact generally implies the promulgation of an authoritarian autocracy where some basic public programs are provided to create a relatively high floor on living standards, but wherein the state not only positions itself to wither at the behest of the collective economy, but expands into the private lives of citizens and recklessly expropriates wealth into the bureaucracy.
So, I try to avoid the term "communist" altogether, as my beliefs are not at all similar to those of persons like Stalin or Mao, neither of whom furthered good faith interpretations of Marx. I prefer "leftist" or "socialist" (the latter of which has faced similar conflation and smearing in the US, but not as badly).
http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/t...hole-countries.3690301/page-64#post-137568129I don't know what thread you're talking about.
hol' up, lemme check occupy democrats fb pageAre you sure it's not 98%? The left like that number.
Well, it's certainly embarrassing from an intellectual, and moral perspective.Wow, he should be reprimanded.
Well, it's certainly embarrassing from an intellectual, and moral perspective.
Suddenly I feel a lot better about some of my War Room posts.
A liberal is classic American. Freedom socially, a free and unbiased market and a voice in an unbiased political system. Purely merit based outside REAL and uncontrollable inability to compete with peers.
Leftism is steal from achievers, give to the inept. Simple.