Are you speaking in terms of an individual WMMA fighter or all? KOs are entertaining for sure, but if you want a fighter to be hurt for the sake of being a women, then you have other worries you should attend to.Not because they are a woman, but because they are annoying and KO's are a normal part of MMA fandom.
Its wrong to want any fighter to be KO'd dummy.
Its wishing brain damage on someone you don't even know.
"Not because they are a woman, but because they are annoying." It takes a tremendous amount of dishonesty and stretching to interpret that phrase as saying all women are annoying and not as a hypothetical reference to an individual fighter. What do you think the first half of that phrase meant? "Because they are all a woman?"All of them are annoying?
You should reevaluate your priorities.
Regardless, you are a sad sad individual. Get some help ts.
I edited it to aid your understanding, but I changed my mind and put it back the way it was. It's actually funnier to watch you misinterpret it.I think it's wrong that you think women are annoying hence want them to get knocked out.
Are you a war machine/travis/Johnson/ that new nfl guy woman beater fan?
*It'sIts wrong to want any fighter to be KO'd dummy.
Its wishing brain damage on someone you don't even know.
It's not my fault you have poor writing skills."Not because they are a woman, but because they are annoying." It takes a tremendous amount of dishonesty and stretching to interpret that phrase as saying all women are annoying and not as a hypothetical reference to an individual fighter. What do you think the first half of that phrase meant? "Because they are all a woman?"
What did the phrase "not because they are a woman" mean to you?Are you speaking in terms of an individual WMMA fighter or all? KOs are entertaining for sure, but if you want a fighter to be hurt for the sake of being a women, then you have other worries you should attend to.