@Phr3121
There's nothing wrong with adding to AIT, soldiers will only benefit from it. Plus bring back the 60? Why? 240B is a great squad machine gun.. the claymore? I was trained on it, I retrained on it multiple times - never used one, in many many months of actual combat. The Gustav, AT-4, AT weapons in general - those are important.
Your infantry experience was so long ago, and so short, I think you're off the path in your logic.
Here dude, I was an 11B squad leader in Afghanistan and have 2 years, in combat as an 11B, before I even went SF.
You non stop talk about RASP, you've never been, you were not in the military when it was created. You talk about how shitty soldiers are today. SirGym is right man it’s always a pissing contest with you always adding in like you know it all.
You don’t. It’s obvious, I don’t see why you need to do that know it all shit. I wouldn’t comment on PsyOps, cause I know about nothing from them, I wouldn’t comment on Marine training, unless I was sure I knew what I was talking about. I especially like how you explain in detail things about SF, our recruiting process, selection, ect. It’s amusing, I stopped correcting your inaccuracies months ago.