- Joined
- Oct 27, 2006
- Messages
- 10,509
- Reaction score
- 76
The best advice I can give is to marry an introvert.
gawd no.The best advice I can give is to marry an introvert.
So why claim that they were a closer family unit?
Um no?
His statement was true only during very early times.
Also it stagnated. Eventually those populations at equator stopped increasing as much or as fast as ones above it in north.
gawd no.
I mean fine if that is your thing. But if your whole goal is to solely try to find someone with little to no social skills and no desire to build them, such that you get someone unlikely to meet someone and establish a relationship where they might cheat, I would rather just stay single.
Any female I am with I want to her to be able to hold her own in a room full of everyday people or high powered executives. I want her to be a challenging successful woman and have no interest in a meek wallflower. But to each there own.
Albeit not pre-historically.
When populations in cold developed higher thinking iq. Etc. They eventually reproduced a lot more and out numbered those down below. The australian aboriginales are essentially an extinct and dead group with very low population numbers before europeans arrived. Subsaharan africa was the same except the eastern horn of africa in some parts. Also the khosians reproduced in lower jumber than bantu and were wiped out by bantu. Some of this talk gets controversial so just PM me we can continue. I dont want to distract or have someone say "racist". Because i know in most of the west now real science is shunned but thisnis not the case outside the west. We can talk about controversial stuff like races and differences and gender differences. Etc.
gawd no.
I mean fine if that is your thing. But if your whole goal is to solely try to find someone with little to no social skills and no desire to build them, such that you get someone unlikely to meet someone and establish a relationship where they might cheat, I would rather just stay single.
Any female I am with I want to her to be able to hold her own in a room full of everyday people or high powered executives. I want her to be a challenging successful woman and have no interest in a meek wallflower. But to each there own.
Is that a bad or uncommon thing or something?Oh, I want a strong, independent woman, blah, blah, blah.
No, you are wrongAll that is correct. Women certainly want to fuck just as much as men, but they're choosier and more selective about whom they do it with. Hence why there's a very general pareto distribution in the sexual market place, where 20% of men have 80% of the sexual access to females, and why the phenomenon of incels is almost exclusively a male problem.
Isn't that right @KONG-D'SNT-TAP ?
Is that a bad or uncommon thing or something?
No, you are wrong
The women that get out of the mating pool are called lesbians
Out of 1 million lesbians, how many would you like to fuck? Where strangely, gay men, tend to be what women would consider, attractive. It’s literally mind blowing
I think it is hard to sum up how to define an "introvert" in a few words but I am comfortable with that definition as a loose one.I would say that there are more types of "introverts" than just the meek wall-flowers.
I don't think it so much tied to development as it is to social interactions.Usually it mostly means that a person is more focused on the internal developments, rather than the external.
Again I don't agree. An extrovert can certainly use introspection and self study just as introvert can quietly observe the world and others, but it is how they interact and present themselves that determines whether they are introverted or extroverted.The process of looking at the world, is simply different, between the two "arch-types". The so-called introvert will form their observations about the world based on rigorous self-study, introspection, while the externally aligned person will form their observations and concepts by picking up signals from other individuals (in today's times, more often than not, from social media, and so forth).
Again I do not concede that introspection is the sole domain or even more predominant in Introverts. You can have an introvert who does no introspection. Who never thinks of the broader world or their place in it. You can have an introvert who is hungry for information in all forms. And both those apply to extroverts as well. Again I do not think you can define introverts and extroverts in that way. Rather is what they do after they have gained whatever information and how they display that outwards that determines if they are introverted or extroverted.Sometimes that might not translate to being a "challenging successful woman" in today's terms, as picking up the "proper" signals has come to be extremely important in today's day and era (which hopefully will soon come to pass). But it might translate to being a person that is not merely the end result of the surrounding culture and social standards.
For those that believe the modern culture to be a degenerate influence, a partner capable of introspection, and of forming ideas independent of the surrounding circumstances, is certainly someone to look for.
The people who are content with the products of modern-day culture, ought to seek the external types.
I've already brought that issue up actually. The pop explosion as far as the time scales I'm aware of were relatively non-negligible before domestication. Interestingly, the point with regard to IQ, hasn't received as much push back on here as I anticipated.
Frankly though, I think people need to read the mass of literature backing up that point, given how central it is to explaining many of our current social problems.
Eventually i think it will come back. The left promotes disorder chaos and self destruction but from that their worst nightmare will take advantage of the weakness to rise. They kill themselves and a new ideology takes their place. You cant win the war if you have limits and are self suiciding yourself and dont have higher purpose or a cause you die for. Essentially only the soulless and mentally ill join their leftists cause. Cant win if you dont show up in large enough numbers. Because muslims are conscious of this stuff to a degree. The koran and hadiths tell them. That isnt even mentioning. That races today derived from billion different factors.
Its tacky to like strong, confident women. WTF?No, not bad, just terribly tacky. FYI, being an introvert isn't tied to public speaking.
I think it is hard to sum up how to define an "introvert" in a few words but I am comfortable with that definition as a loose one.
I don't think it so much tied to development as it is to social interactions.
Again I don't agree. An extrovert can certainly use introspection and self study just as introvert can quietly observe the world and others, but it is how they interact and present themselves that determines whether they are introverted or extroverted.
Again I do not concede that introspection is the sole domain or even more predominant in Introverts. You can have an introvert who does no introspection. Who never thinks of the broader world or their place in it. You can have an introvert who is hungry for information in all forms. And both those apply to extroverts as well. Again I do not think you can define introverts and extroverts in that way. Rather is what they do after they have gained whatever information and how they display that outwards that determines if they are introverted or extroverted.
Its tacky to like strong, confident women. WTF?
And no, its not tied to public speaking. It IS tied to how you carry yourself and conduct yourself in public and in group settings with other people.