- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 51,530
- Reaction score
- 87,112
https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/the-michael-jackson-chemical-castration-conspiracy-explained
Almost all links in this story are in the UK.
It just didnt happen and really no one believes it but a handful of people and is why you really get no reputable articles on it
The most relevant paragraphs of this article, is this -
WOULD CHEMICAL CASTRATION HAVE PREVENTED MJ’S ALLEGED (AND DISMISSED) SEXUAL ABUSE?
What we know about using castration, chemical or otherwise, to prevent sex offenders from acting out, is that the results are inconsistent. As Slate explained, a castrated man can still potentially get an erection and therefore still offend, either because the result is only diminished testosterone, or the man could also take testosterone again to boost production. (There can also still be some sexual function with surgical castration, too, because the adrenal glands produce 5 percent of testosterone.) The same goes for the chemically castrated: You can still get some sexual function, and it’s seen in as many as 10 percent of those who undergo the treatment.
Interesting. So even if it is true, and Jackson was castrated, he could still get an erection.
But, the article does not explain why Michael's 'kids' aren't his biological kids.