RIP GirlsDoPorn

Im not known for really delving into details and arguing on threads but this issue and these women seems like a worthy cause to me given the uneducated and ignorant responses by so many on here.

I read the whole court document last night and it is well worth the read.
Same, bro. Same.
 
Idunno, the producers are in the wrong and deserved the suit (not sure if anyone would dispute that).

I also have a hard time having much (if any) sympathy from the girls. I think society views women as naive, innocent, and incapable (which is patronizing in itself).

I feel the same way as when Ashley Madison got leaked. Yea, the customers should not have lost their confidentiality, but if you're feeling you did something bad to the point that it needs to be top secret (cheating on boyfriend, lying to family, etc.) maybe you shouldn't be doing it (?)
 
Last edited:
Nobody seems to care that these girls cheated on their boyfriends.

lVLjsDY.jpg
 
They HAD to have been tricked into doing porn, otherwise their friends and families would think of them as whores.


The case isn't about being TRICKED into porn it's about distribution method of the porn. They did not sign a contract to have porn distributed on GDP. GDP setup fake casting websites for modeling gigs. Girls respond and they they are told its for porn for private collectors via DVD. They sign a long contract stating different in that the content can be used for anything, they do the shoot and then a month later they are appearing on one of the most popular porn websites in the world.


People ignore the part where they're asked in the beginning if they have boyfriends and they all practically doing this behind their boyfriends' backs. Getting asked if they like the dick better than their boyfriends while getting fucked and they all say yea


More evidence that they didn't think this was going to see the light of day.
 
Nobody seems to care that these girls cheated on their boyfriends.


Because it has a nothing to do with the case. Are you claiming all 22 of them had a boyfriend at the time? How do you break this down...girls without a boyfriend get the settlement?
 
they dont deserve that money. dont feel bad for them in the least



I’m with you on the last part. Every single one of them knew damn well what they were there for. What I can also believe is that they were told that the film would only be put on DVD format or whatever -I can see them being lied to about that. But they all agreed to take dick on film, and I highly doubt they were ‘intimidated’ into it. More like, ‘what’s your number to blow this dude while I film it’.


And that’s why I don’t feel bad for any of them.
 
Unless you believe that a con man car salesman that scams people by turning back the odometer has the right to blame the customer for wanting to buy a car........

Pretty much this. I assume most aren’t reading the background info but this was a pretty sophisticated scam.

I wouldn’t put the women on the level of sex assault victims though.
 
A local modelling gig that went south?



The transcripts that were posted months ago in a different thread did not read like that at all. They hired other chicks to call these girls while they were still at home to make them feel more comfortable about doing porn -before they ever flew anywhere or went anywhere to do it.
 
The transcripts that were posted months ago in a different thread did not read like that at all. They hired other chicks to call these girls while they were still at home to make them feel more comfortable about doing porn -before they ever flew anywhere or went anywhere to do it.




These girls are in the wrong in the same way that you would be wrong if you bought a car with the mileage rolled way back on the odometer and the entire dealership was in on it.
 
These girls are in the wrong in the same way that you would be wrong if you bought a car with the mileage rolled way back on the odometer and the entire dealership was in on it.



Stop using that stupid fucking analogy.
 
Stop using that stupid fucking analogy.


Its a great analogy. The only problem is it in no way addresses how terribly these women were cheated and lied to and harmed. But the basic analogy is perfectly accurate.

The women signed up to do something completely legal but every other aspect of the deal was a lie on the part of the criminals who perpetrated it including bullying, intimidation, giving alcohol and drugs to minors to cloud their thinking, threatening financial consequences if they did not do it, or continue to do it when they became uncomfortable, were purposefully outed in their workplaces and hometowns and with family to help the videos go viral, told that the videos would be DVD's only that were encrypted and impossible to copy, made for a singular wealthy client in Australia who had signed a non disclosure agreement, and provided false witnesses as to the legitimacy of the entire operation and the confidentiality they could expect. The women were even told that the producers had ways of taking any videos down that in the extremely unlikely chance of them going public.

This is what the women are complaining about and what the court case was about-- not the doing of porn part.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Bang Bang what's your take on this? I found a couple vids on the hub and they don't seem like they're being forced into it or anything, just looks like regular porn for the most part
 
@Bang Bang what's your take on this? I found a couple vids on the hub and they don't seem like they're being forced into it or anything, just looks like regular porn for the most part


The women signed up to do something completely legal but every other aspect of the deal was a lie on the part of the criminals who perpetrated it including bullying, intimidation, giving alcohol and drugs to minors to cloud their thinking, threatening financial consequences if they did not do it, or continue to do it when they became uncomfortable, were purposefully outed in their workplaces and hometowns and with family to help the videos go viral, told that the videos would be DVD's only that were encrypted and impossible to copy, made for a singular wealthy client in Australia who had signed a non disclosure agreement, and provided false witnesses as to the legitimacy of the entire operation and the confidentiality they could expect. The women were even told that the producers had ways of taking any videos down that in the extremely unlikely chance of them going public.

This is what the women are complaining about and what the court case was about-- not the doing of porn part.
 
The women signed up to do something completely legal but every other aspect of the deal was a lie on the part of the criminals who perpetrated it including bullying, intimidation, giving alcohol and drugs to minors to cloud their thinking, threatening financial consequences if they did not do it, or continue to do it when they became uncomfortable, were purposefully outed in their workplaces and hometowns and with family to help the videos go viral, told that the videos would be DVD's only that were encrypted and impossible to copy, made for a singular wealthy client in Australia who had signed a non disclosure agreement, and provided false witnesses as to the legitimacy of the entire operation and the confidentiality they could expect. The women were even told that the producers had ways of taking any videos down that in the extremely unlikely chance of them going public.

This is what the women are complaining about and what the court case was about-- not the doing of porn part.
I read some of the articles and said they were pretty much forced into it ie intimidated etc
 
The women signed up to do something completely legal but every other aspect of the deal was a lie on the part of the criminals who perpetrated it including bullying, intimidation, giving alcohol and drugs to minors to cloud their thinking, threatening financial consequences if they did not do it, or continue to do it when they became uncomfortable, were purposefully outed in their workplaces and hometowns and with family to help the videos go viral, told that the videos would be DVD's only that were encrypted and impossible to copy, made for a singular wealthy client in Australia who had signed a non disclosure agreement, and provided false witnesses as to the legitimacy of the entire operation and the confidentiality they could expect. The women were even told that the producers had ways of taking any videos down that in the extremely unlikely chance of them going public.

This is what the women are complaining about and what the court case was about-- not the doing of porn part.

People who aren't virgins like you don't buy that. Have you ever formed relationships with girls when you were in high school and fucking realize how smart and deceptive they are at pulling emotional strings?
 
People who aren't virgins like you don't buy that. Have you ever formed relationships with girls when you were in high school and fucking realize how smart and deceptive they are at pulling emotional strings?


Dude--- we have the court findings....... all you have to do is read them........ Are you really that stupid? Everything I wrote is fact-- not just some imagined idea you have made up in your head about it.
 
Idunno, the producers are in the wrong and deserved the suit (not sure if anyone would dispute that).

I also have a hard time having much (if any) sympathy from the girls. I think society views women as naive, innocent, and incapable (which is patronizing in itself).

I feel the same way as when Ashley Madison got leaked. Yea, the customers should not have lost their confidentiality, but if you're feeling you did something bad to the point that it needs to be top secret (cheating on boyfriend, lying to family, etc.) maybe you shouldn't be doing it (?)
Wasn’t Ashley Madison like 70% married guys?
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,238,151
Messages
55,540,791
Members
174,823
Latest member
MaybeHawk
Back
Top