- Joined
- Mar 3, 2014
- Messages
- 57,511
- Reaction score
- 21,592
Even better is saying he didn't get charged for anything. Uh, that's why there was a trial.
Illegally acquiring a firearm to then travel interstate to a heated protest is not self defence.
It's not like he was minding his own business and got randomly jumped, he went there specifically looking for confrontation.
You're arguing semantics.By other state you mean a city 15 - 20 mins away, where his dad lives, he works in, and has long standing ties to?
-SHOW ME ONE PERSON THAT......!!!!That's the weakest example you could give me, the other one quoting this post is no better. It's even weaker than an anonymous post online because at least that's someone with a history of stances or statements even if there's not a name or face to it. There's no source to these, no one standing by them. I promise there are more people who think Hitler had good intentions than the people who think that dude was a hero.
lolz @ how the genius lefties just keep parroting this nonsense.
why exactly do you think this 'HE TRAVELED ACROSS STATE LINES!!!' is some sort of gotcha? in what world does this make sense? also... his family lives in kenosha, einstein.
Look, Man... I appreciate you not blasting me or whatever, but I don't care if he's 1/4 latino at all. The question is did he pose for pictures with the proud boys throwing up known white powers signs
Kyle Rittenhouse didn't travel to another state because he was super concerned about private businesses getting damaged
Any reason why he never got the firearm charge?
You're arguing semantics.
What do you mean... You can't possibly believe that he wasn't doing exactly what I just pointed out.we are doomed.
like half the country is stupid enough to believe all this shit.
er....And now the precedent has been set
Byecep?
What is a white power sign?What do you mean... You can't possibly believe that he wasn't doing exactly what I just pointed out.
I'm sure they did buy it, but like I said earlier, it doesn't matter in the context of what took place. And truth be told, it doesn't matter as it pertains to what I said earlier... My point is that people typically don't thrust themselves into a situation like that without strong motivation. And the pictures he took afterward betray his intentions. It's just so obvious.It's not really semantics when you actually look at the naunce. When you and the media stay crossed state lines, it's technically correct but what you're ignoring is that it's a short distance from his residence, he works in the city, his dad lives there, he has long standing ties to it. It's not like he drove six hours to a city in which he had no ties to.
The state lines with out adding in the context is a disingenuous argument the left is is using as a gotcha. That's why the jury didn't buy it.
Don't be stupid.What is a white power sign?
What makes something a white power sign?
Who makes something a white power sign?
No, well he should be charged.
I thought Rittenhouse was technically not supposed to be carrying either but maybe that only applies to a short barrel gun?
I'm sure they did buy it, but like I said earlier, it doesn't matter in the context of what took place. And truth be told, it doesn't matter as it pertains to what I said earlier... My point is that people typically don't thrust themselves into a situation like that without strong motivation. And the pictures he took afterward betray his intentions. It's just so obvious.
Mate your side fell for a 4chan troll. I don't know who's the stupid one.Don't be stupid.
You're being disingenuous byI'm sure they did buy it, but like I said earlier, it doesn't matter in the context of what took place. And truth be told, it doesn't matter as it pertains to what I said earlier... My point is that people typically don't thrust themselves into a situation like that without strong motivation. And the pictures he took afterward betray his intentions. It's just so obvious.