- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 13,585
- Reaction score
- 13,767
The textGosh I wonder what happened to change the vote so quickly??
.
The textGosh I wonder what happened to change the vote so quickly??
.
What textThe text
Veterans orgs. and others were giving the GOP a lot of shit. This was very very bad P.R.The text
Veterans orgs. and others were giving the GOP a lot of shit. This was very very bad P.R.
Nah bro…
those guys failed the veterans.
What y’all call tribalism I call Set Tripping.
Which the Urban Dictionary defines as:
"Sets" are refrences to street gangs. Set tripping is violent results from the confrontation of two rival gangs or gang members. Gang members identify eachother by tattoos, hand signs, and colors worn. Gang members or gangbangers rarley hesitate to attack another gang member who represents a rival gang.
"Ready to pop the clip in, ready to start (set) trippin'" - T.I.
Bloods crips vicelords etc all behave in a similar fashion.
think about all the peace talks that fell thru in the 90’s… same shit at play here with the Dems and Repubs…
only instead of a street corner they’re playing with or lives and bank accounts.
"Damn you hypocrites for doing the right thing"There is like 80 billion in non discretionary spending in the defense bill every year not a single Republican has a problem with that one. Yet 40 billion a year for a decade they suddenly have a problem please.
Where are all the pearl clutchers at now?
You guys are a bunch of wet noodles.
It's not current pork per se, it's just a loophole to smuggle it in later. You should know by now they don't write bills that are just what they say they are. It's not even clever, but everyone has to pretend the bills are all "the hugs for puppies act" because they can't make a separate bill called "pork for donors".
Yet the bill specifies that all funds goes towards the treatment of veterans. This is made clear in Section 805 - Cost Of War Toxic Exposures Fund:Such an obvious factual truth yet the left pretends it’s not true.
The little coward shrinks when confronted.
You just can't help putting your footh in your mouth huh. The bill with the exact same funding, which is all spending towards veterans care and no pork, was passed by the Senate in June. Then the republicans tried to vote it down for political reasons, after it came back again. Then they were pressured and shown to be liars and cowards by their false objections, and a few days later they cave and pass it again. Truly showing that nothing was wrong with the bill in the first place and it was all political theater. Which it was.Where are all the pearl clutchers at now?
Not caring that wrestlers on your team were getting their balls fondled, by the team Doctor, is not a molester. A coward sure, but not a molester.Glorification of political violence and calling someone a molester. You should go for the trifecta and accuse someone of inappropriate behavior with children.
Yet the bill specifies that all funds goes towards the treatment of veterans. This is made clear in Section 805 - Cost Of War Toxic Exposures Fund:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th...7/text#toc-id8d28be5dbe7641119ca3b32d1e58ca80“(a) Establishment.—There is hereby established in the Treasury of the United States an account to be known as the ‘Cost of War Toxic Exposures Fund’ (the ‘Fund’), to be administered by the Secretary.
(1) the delivery of veterans’ health care associated with exposure to environmental hazards in the active military, naval, air, or space service in programs administered by the Under Secretary for Health;
“(2) any expenses incident to the delivery of veterans’ health care and benefits associated with exposure to environmental hazards in the active military, naval, air, or space service, including administrative expenses, such as information technology and claims processing and appeals, and excluding leases as authorized or approved under section 8104 of this title; and
“(3) medical and other research relating to exposure to environmental hazards.
So your "factual truth" is made up. You don't get to invent it, and in this instance, you are both wrong.