- Joined
- Apr 14, 2022
- Messages
- 283
- Reaction score
- 285
https://youtube.com/shorts/Ez3tpc9Ujs4?feature=share
Do you disagree with Mike Mentzer's assertion that one set is ideal?
Respect to Mentzer/Yates/etc. And I’m no expert, but it seems “one set” is just another way of saying “ramp sets going to failure on the last set”. That is, you’re getting plenty of volume in the routine. They just frame it in a way to suggest that the last set is the only one that matters.
Edit: and just as an example, linked below is Dorian's routine. On chest day, for example, he does 6 different chest exercises, for 3x10-12 on each exercise. That's roughly 200 reps for chest in a single workout, in a routine that is based on the philosophy that volume is meaningless.
https://jackedgorilla.com/dorian-yates-workout-routine/
Here's my contribution to old timey swole motherfuckers:
The toughest people wear flowers on their dicks.
I was going to clarify but couldn’t think of a short way. This is essentially it. Adding one piece. Genetics. Mike said he bases how frequently they lift on how they respond. Some can handle very little, others a lot, on juice a ton. So 1-2 days a week for the very little crowd, 2-4 for the gifted, and 3-4 for juicers (at bodybuilding). I honestly need to grab his book and go all out on reading up. It fits my observations over the years. I throw people on four day splits or three depending on how much time they have. Four day splits are 45 minutes, three day are just over an hour. I also like slow controlled reps, especially for arms. Three exercises for big muscles and two for little ones. That’s a formula people can stick toRespect to Mentzer/Yates/etc. And I’m no expert, but it seems “one set” is just another way of saying “ramp sets going to failure on the last set”. That is, you’re getting plenty of volume in the routine. They just frame it in a way to suggest that the last set is the only one that matters.
Edit: and just as an example, linked below is Dorian's routine. On chest day, for example, he does 6 different chest exercises, for 3x10-12 on each exercise. That's roughly 200 reps for chest in a single workout, in a routine that is based on the philosophy that volume is meaningless.
https://jackedgorilla.com/dorian-yates-workout-routine/
I've noticed that old timey strongmen/bodybuilders all have thick ass horse necks. I've never seen an image of a pre-1940's (when steroids first became available) strongman with built arms and legs and a pencil neck, like you commonly see in today's roided fitness influencers and the like.
I wonder if this is because 1) full body strongman style training also works the neck and traps, leading to hypertrophy over time or 2) old timey dudes with natty jacked genetics had natty thick necks vs. new school roided guys pushing their arms and legs way beyond their genetic limits via BB-style training, but neck size is limited like calf muscle development having a large genetic component.
I've noticed that old timey strongmen/bodybuilders all have thick ass horse necks. I've never seen an image of a pre-1940's (when steroids first became available) strongman with built arms and legs and a pencil neck, like you commonly see in today's roided fitness influencers and the like.
I wonder if this is because 1) full body strongman style training also works the neck and traps, leading to hypertrophy over time or 2) old timey dudes with natty jacked genetics had natty thick necks vs. new school roided guys pushing their arms and legs way beyond their genetic limits via BB-style training, but neck size is limited like calf muscle development having a large genetic component.
Isn't Full-Body very slow-twitch and more endurance? You guys talk about farm boy strength, but I've done farm work and other manual labor and I felt that it gave me a lot of functional endurance but not much size and strength. The same thing happens when I do volume training. Powerlifting and HIT have been the only things that have worked for me.
I'm naturally pretty fast twitch.
HIT really comes from very old strong man training that was before Arthur Jones. It is closer to strength training than hypertrophy.
Yeah I’m guessing their training style was closer to strongman/gymnast/olympic weightlifter with lots of heavy full body movements and overhead pressing than it was to modern bodybuilding. I know at least Sandow started as a strongman. They all have very blocky torsos with really developed abs and obliques, waists that would probably be considered too wide for a bodybuilder now. Their physiques seem closer to this (weightlifter Pyrros Dimas) than to a bodybuilder:
Precursors to modern bodybuilding were guys like Steve Reeves, Reg Park or Vince Gironda. Their physiques were natty probably but a lot less blocky, wider lats, shredded abs, small waist; a more “modern” aesthetic. And they didn’t have massive necks:
It's funny you wrote this today, because I was just looking at this page earlier:
https://www.oldtimestrongman.com/blog/tag/neck-exercise/
Old timey strongmen worked their necks like fucking maniacs!
some of the shit they do is the only way to survive this:
I get the sense old timey strongmen did a fair amount of wrestling and combat sports coming up - that's kind of what you did if you were a toughguy back in the day. And a strong neck is part and parcel with effectiveness in combat sports - it's literally your fifth limb and without a strong one, you're much easier to KO or takedown/pin/control on the mat. I'm still not sure if it's possible without hidden support, but Farmer Burns surviving a 6 foot drop and then being hanged with a noose for 3 minutes seems fucking insane, even with his supposedly 21" neck at 170 lbs. And he apparently did this act regularly at county fairs and circuses.
AFAIK any time you train heavy, fast, or to failure, you hit the fast twitch fibres. Full-body routine aren't usually slow-twitch dominant.
The really old timey strongmen never trained to failure.
That is true
W/ a full body routine, someone would have to pace themselves. One set to failure is an all out sprint
I do full body and i always go until failure or very closeCan you tell me what you mean here? I'm not sure I'm following. And I just realized that traditional HIT routines are full-body routines, so now I really don't understand what you're saying.
I do full body and i always go until failure or very close