- Joined
- Aug 10, 2016
- Messages
- 5,183
- Reaction score
- 9,004
you're right. this isn't exactly like gay panic, and you definitely aren't proving his point! great job!This is a losing argument...drag show story hour is a disgusting abomination...
you're right. this isn't exactly like gay panic, and you definitely aren't proving his point! great job!This is a losing argument...drag show story hour is a disgusting abomination...
"the Republican strategists"=conservative talk radioThey don't actually care about kids. They take their cues from the Republican strategists who find some random issue to rile the wingnuts up about each election cycle. This year it's drag shows. It will be something else in 2 years.
you're right. this isn't exactly like gay panic, and you definitely aren't proving his point! great job!
You sound perfectly reasonable and not even a little unhinged.
No it doesn't invalidate the movement. I think the anti trans movement is bullshit Republicans use to distract their voters from the fact they have no real policies that help working class folks.
What Lauren bobo did is like some climate change dem rolling coal in people's faces while having an oil tycoon as a passenger.
Ah the old so you’re saying you hate Jews approachSaying Story Hour or all drag shows are about showing balls is a lie. An obvious one.
Wait, you don't think that Republican voters actually object to the trans movement but are just being distracted by Republican politicians?
Yeah, like when kids are there they have their parents consent; in fact the parents are usually present. Good point. That's an important distinction. Edit: I mean, really good point. It seems to be easily disregarded every time these discussions come up on Sherdog. WTG.
No, they object to trans people (there is no movement) BECAUSE they are being distracted by Republican politicians.Wait, you don't think that Republican voters actually object to the trans movement but are just being distracted by Republican politicians?
Did the parents attending Beetlejuice give Broebert permission to expose her breasts and fondle her date's junk?Is it okay to hold the position that this is inappropriate behavior but it’s obviously more inappropriate to have child drag shows? How is that not the most obvious position to have?
Is it okay to hold the position that this is inappropriate behavior but it’s obviously more inappropriate to have child drag shows? How is that not the most obvious position to have?
Likely illegal? Explain.What Boebert was doing is likely illegal. Where a “drag show” in and of itself is not.
Likely illegal? Explain.
Nothing in the OP stated she was doing anything illegal. Was she witnessed doing it or was that only after the fact with the video? My understanding was she was thrown out for other reasons.Are you dense or being obtuse? In case you are genuinely just unaware sexual acts in public are not legal.
Colorado law states that public indecency is committed when a person performs certain acts in a public place, or in a place where the public is likely to see, including lewdly fondling or caressing another individual. Sexual intercourse; lewd exposure of the body
https://www.newsweek.com/lauren-boebert-may-have-broken-law-theater-fondling-1827773?amp=1
Colorado Representative Lauren Boebert will not be charged for public indecency or otherwise, after video footage captured her seemingly being intimate during a public theater performance in Denver on September 10.
IIRC, she’s been accused of lewdness, jackrolling, sneak thievery, chloral hydrating, sodomy, strangulation and enthusiastic corruption of the public good.Likely illegal? Explain.
Nothing in the OP stated she was doing anything illegal. Was she witnessed doing it or was that only after the fact with the video? My understanding was she was thrown out for other reasons.
Also @Source first line in your article
Dude, nobody, especially parents, gives a shit about sexualizing their children. It's all a GOP boogeyman.