- Joined
- Jan 25, 2016
- Messages
- 23,217
- Reaction score
- 17,906
Obviously if they are fighting a guerrilla war, the intent is to not fight toe to toe in a set piece battle like in Ukraine. Obviously, a predictable result of Hamas' attack would be retaliation in a densely populated urban area where lots of women and kids are going to die.
There's the bad faith criticism (anytime a civilian dies) when Israel had good targeting info. But I think there is a good faith criticism that they are blowing up entire houses with families in them because they know a Hamas fighter lives there (even though he's likely on duty and not present). Or striking a refugee camp, killing one hundred civilians because they "think" a Hamas commander will be present. That type of criticism is hard to quantify because what is the trade off that is acceptable? It's impossible to give an answer to this but there's got to be a line somewhere or we are all war criminals.
Is it wrong of Israel to send a message to hamas and the world that if you try to do this type of thing to us the absolute destruction of your people and your world will be the result ?
Also when your goal is to stop an enemy from having the ability to wage war with you , thats right next door to you making it super urgent ,in a place as densely packed as gaza with an enemy that hides with civilians to maximize carnage all while trying to minimalize your own casualties....what choice is there really but to get super ugly about it ?