Law The Lonestar Rebellion is here. Get onboard or get run over. We will defend America's borders!

[Spounman]

But it was ok when Beetlejuice did it?

 

[Sinister]

You could easily argue it. Filing a case wouldn't matter because the feds aren't going to police themselves, the courts included.

The argument is nonsense. Which is why most of this statement is you ducking the notion of actually trying it.

 

[LMP]

But it was ok when Beetlejuice did it?

Are you suggesting that Abbott should be voted out of office, just as littlefoot was? I support this.

 

[GearSolidMetal]

I dont "say" it's far right, their record speaks for itself.

This recent decision says otherwise.

Regardless, the Supreme Court has no powers to enforce their decisions without the feds getting involved. You lefties should be rejoicing. Obama repeatedly ignored their rulings, about time Republicans realized they can tell them to fuck off too.

If the Supreme Court rules a state can't take Trump name off the ballot, the state can tell them to fuck off and take his name off the ballot.

The Republicans people like you elect have publicly admitted that they're sticking their thumbs up their @sses because it would nullify an issue the nominee for President desires to campaign on to take advantage of the rabid xenophobia they've cultivated.

You claim we're xenophobic, when its pretty clear you haven't seen or experiences the suffering of the drug crisis, cartels, or seen victims of sex trafficking for yourself.

And if you had you'd probably find a way to blame it on Republicans, because people like you never realize you're wrong no matter what.

 

[Spounman]

This recent decision says otherwise.

Regardless, the Supreme Court has no powers to enforce their decisions without the feds getting involved. You lefties should be rejoicing. Obama repeatedly ignored their rulings, about time Republicans realized they can tell them to fuck off too.

If the Supreme Court rules a state can't take Trump name off the ballot, the state can tell them to fuck off and take his name off the ballot.


You claim we're xenophobic, when its pretty clear you haven't seen or experiences the suffering of the drug crisis, cartels, or seen victims of sex trafficking for yourself.

And if you had you'd probably find a way to blame it on Republicans, because people like you never realize you're wrong no matter what.

I wonder if Joe is seeking council on this matter from Hunter "the smartest guy I know" Biden

 

[SakurabasEar]

The conflicting legal arguments don't even matter to me at this point. The left isn't interested in protecting this country. This is an allowed illegal invasion, predicated on gathering votes. Texas has every right to try and protect its borders, plain and simple

 

[GearSolidMetal]

In other news -

DEA seized record 386 million deadly fentanyl doses in 2023 — enough to kill every American​

MSN

In 2023 fentanyl overdoses ravaged the US and fueled a new culture war fight​

"For the first time in U.S. history, fatal overdoses peaked above 112,000 deaths, with young people and people of color among the hardest hit."

In 2023 fentanyl overdoses ravaged the US and fueled a new culture war fight

Fentanyl fueled unprecedented carnage with 112,000 fatal overdoses. The nation is increasingly divided over how to respond.

www.opb.org

Fentanyl seizures rise at U.S.-Mexico border — here's why

GOP lawmakers have incorrectly blamed the spike in fentanyl overdoses on migrants, whom they blame for bringing the drugs across the border.

www.cbsnews.com

"The spike in fentanyl-related overdose deaths in the U.S. has fueled a national conversation and a redoubling of the government's efforts to curb its smuggling. In 2021, 90% of some 80,000 opioid-related deaths involved fentanyl, federal statistics show.

Most fentanyl is being smuggled into the U.S. along the southern border, often in vehicles driven by American citizens, as cartels and other criminal groups in Mexico have turned the production of the synthetic opioid into a clandestine industry that has become the primary source of fentanyl in the U.S., according to the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).

In fiscal year 2022, 84% of the 14,104 pounds of fentanyl seized along the Mexican border were detected by officers at ports of entry overseen by the Office of Field Operations, a CBP branch, according to government data."

Fentanyl seizures rise at U.S.-Mexico border — here's why

GOP lawmakers have incorrectly blamed the spike in fentanyl overdoses on migrants, whom they blame for bringing the drugs across the border.

www.cbsnews.com

@Sinister
Go ahead, claim Republicans are 'campaign on to take advantage of the rabid xenophobia they've cultivated.' When all Biden has to do is approve funds for Border security, and he also gets the cash for Ukraine & Israel as a bonus.

And those are just 4 headlines related to drug smuggling. I can easily look up far more disgusting reports about rape & sex-slave trafficking.

 

[ColemanwastheGOAT]

Post in thread 'Meme Thread v101: Introduction to Memes (Recommended for the Left)' https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/...commended-for-the-left.4319866/post-172737339

I am a prophet.

 

[Rod1]

I'm not going to argue with your fantasies of your political opposition.

If you weren't so emotional you'd begin to think more clearly.

Holy fuck.... you're lacking an argument so badly you're both gaslighting me claiming 'I think the federal government should start shooting the invaders?'

Dude you were saying that the Constitution doesn't matters because an State was told to fuck themselves after they were being invaded, then you accuse me of gaslighting when you kept calling it an invasion and that the Constitution doesn't matters because its a literal invasion.

Well, an invasion literally means the US should use military force to defend its borders.

 

[Rod1]

If you weren't so emotional you'd begin to think more clearly.

Im thinking quite clearly, its an immigration crisis, not an invasion, i was merely gauging to see whether you are a crazy guy, a moron or simply someone who argues of bad faith.

You seem to be the last one, claiming its an invasion, that Constitutional order is broken that there is a dereliction of duty and outright overreacting, but when pressed on your own fucking words INVASION now you claim its not really an invasion?

 

[SakurabasEar]

Im thinking quite clearly, its an immigration crisis, not an invasion, i was merely gauging to see whether you are a crazy guy, a moron or simply someone who argues of bad faith.

You seem to be the last one, claiming its an invasion, that Constitutional order is broken that there is a dereliction of duty and outright overreacting, but when pressed on your own fucking words INVASION now you claim its not really an invasion?

Its an allowed invasion of illegals

 

[Rod1]

Its an allowed invasion of illegals

No, its not he already pointed out thats its a problem of the system being overwhelmed by a loophole.


Something this admin is trying to close btw they want to argue that any asylum seeker that didnt applied asylum in a third country must be rejected.

 

[Sinister]

This recent decision says otherwise.

Regardless, the Supreme Court has no powers to enforce their decisions without the feds getting involved. You lefties should be rejoicing. Obama repeatedly ignored their rulings, about time Republicans realized they can tell them to fuck off too.

If the Supreme Court rules a state can't take Trump name off the ballot, the state can tell them to fuck off and take his name off the ballot.


You claim we're xenophobic, when its pretty clear you haven't seen or experiences the suffering of the drug crisis, cartels, or seen victims of sex trafficking for yourself.

And if you had you'd probably find a way to blame it on Republicans, because people like you never realize you're wrong no matter what.

Republicans have repeatedly ignored the SCOTUS, specifically where disenfranchising minority voters is concerned. Blatant power grabs. Pretending this is the first time is preposterous.

The Constitution very clearly gives the Federal Government the power to regulate international borders and enforce relevant laws. A state being a border State gives it no distinct legal standing to go rogue.

Of course you're xenophobic, and you're using your xenophobia to attempt to demonize anyone who disagrees with you. And if you had half a brain or the ability to learn youd have realized by now that you're most vehemently arguing in here with people much closer to this issue than youd like to think. But if we dont match your xenophobia, you make bold and misguided assessments like that.

 

[Super_Nintendo]

edit lol

 

[SakurabasEar]

No, its not he already pointed out thats its a problem of the system being overwhelmed by a loophole.


Something this admin is trying to close btw they want to argue that any asylum seeker that didnt applied asylum in a third country must be rejected.

No, its a massive migration of illegals that flooded the boarder after President Biden took office and repelled every measurement taken beforehand. Call it what you want, the reality of the situation is that this isn’t, and hasn't been sustainable and Texas has every right to bolster its defenses against this invasion of people

 

[Sinister]

No, its massive migration of illegals that flooded the boarder after president biden took office and repelled every measurement taken beforehand. Call it what you want, the reality of the situation is that this isnt, and hasn't been sustainable and Texas has every right to bolster its defenses against this invasion of people.

No it doesnt. Even if that nonsense was true, Texas has NO right to regulate an international border on its own.

 

[SakurabasEar]

No it doesnt. Even if that nonsense was true, Texas has NO right to regulate an international border on its own.

This isn't nonsense to anybody that doesn't have their head up their ass. Of course the state of Texas has the responsibility and right to protecting its people, especially when the federal government is working directly against it. And certainly, that is what is happening, regardless what legal quack job logic you can come up with to help defend this embarrassing administration

 

[GearSolidMetal]

Im thinking quite clearly, its an immigration crisis, not an invasion,

And to you an immigration crisis can't be an invasion, no matter how many millions of 'asylum seekers' flood the border.

i was merely gauging to see whether you are a crazy guy, a moron or simply someone who argues of bad faith.

By calling them all 'Asylum Seekers' you're a moron or simply someone who argues on bad faith.

You seem to be the last one, claiming its an invasion, that Constitutional order is broken that there is a dereliction of duty and outright overreacting, but when pressed on your own fucking words INVASION now you claim its not really an invasion?

Take a breath and rephrase this so it makes sense.

No, its not he already pointed out thats its a problem of the system being overwhelmed by a loophole.


Something this admin is trying to close btw they want to argue that any asylum seeker that didnt applied asylum in a third country must be rejected.

There's dozens of locations throughout Latin America legitimate Asylum Seekers can apply, rather than flooding the borders by the hundreds of thousands every month.

Automatically rejecting all that flood the border and only accepting applicants from those locations would be a legitimate means to solve the problem.

But to you, the problem is there's a border at all.

 

[Sinister]

This isn't nonsense to anybody that doesn't have their head up their ass. Of course the state of Texas has the responsibility and right to protecting its people, especially when the federal government working directly against it. And certainly, that is what is happening, regardless what legal quack job logic you can come up with to help defend this embarrassing administration

It's definitely nonsense. But it's very telling to see outright dismissal of the Constitution when convenient, spirnkeld with the ever-admirable replacement theory garbage littered throughout this thread. The Federal Government and the Judicial Branch have made the legal aspects quite clear, and they back what I have said. You hatred of those people and support for the political theater being carried out by Texas and National Republicans to preserve a single issue to attempt to leverage the re-installation of Trumpism notwithstanding.

In another thread I posted data that Trump's administration ALSO saw record border crossings and that was WITH the pandemic. I also posted data that the Trump administration was also far more likely to release undocumented border crossers than this Administration is. You have National Republicans admitting a good deal was on the table, AND that Trump has essentially demanded this remain a wedge issue. Texas has NO legal standing to booby-trap the border, and this issue will not be solved by cruelty.

 

[GearSolidMetal]

Republicans have repeatedly ignored the SCOTUS, specifically where disenfranchising minority voters is concerned. Blatant power grabs. Pretending this is the first time is preposterous.

Oh please, stop falling for the 'Voter ID is racist' phrase that gullible idiots fall for.

Black people flooded the polls in 2008 & 2012 for Obama in voter-ID required states. Not to mention you basically can't do anything without ID, including get a job, collect government benefits, drive, or buy alcohol.

The Constitution very clearly gives the Federal Government the power to regulate international borders and enforce relevant laws. A state being a border State gives it no distinct legal standing to go rogue.

And the founders didn't fathom a Federal Government that couldn't care less about enforcing the border against an invasion, but that's exactly what's happening.

The invasion is draining the state of its resources, its their right to repel the invaders.
Oh its not a right given by the feds? Screw them then.

Of course you're xenophobic, and you're using your xenophobia to attempt to demonize anyone who disagrees with you.

Say you can't respond to those headlines without saying you can't respond to those headlines, so you avoid doing so by crying 'Xenophobe! Xenophobe! Xenophobe!'

At least try to be clever and not so pathetically transparent.

And if you had half a brain or the ability to learn youd have realized by now that you're most vehemently arguing in here with people much closer to this issue than youd like to think.

Go ahead, state how you're 'much closer to this issue than I'd like to think.'

But if we dont match your xenophobia, you make bold and misguided assessments like that.

Just say you don't give a fuck about the drug crisis, the sex-trafficking, or the cartels and their impact on the nation and your respect will increase by 1000% in the Warroom.