- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Messages
- 8,315
- Reaction score
- 5
No they're not often the same.Those top sprinters and top level NCAA & NFL players are often one and the same. An internet search will provide a long list. Travis Williams, Bob Hayes, Willie Gault, Johnny Jones, et al. I can think of about 15 of them who ran in the Olympics. The list is much longer if you add other events.
The list isn't very long, there are about 30 nfl players that have competed in any modern Olympic games.
Weak troll.
Tim Montgomery actively participated in the 60m. In 2002 when he sent the 100m record at 9.78 seconds, he was also competing in the 60m - fastest time from 2000-2002 was 6.46 seconds. Obviously those times were when he was juicing.The sprinter doesn't have more time to accelerate. In fact, a sprinter is at his fastest right around 50-60m, maintains that velocity for 15-25 meters, and then decelerates for the last 15-25m.
You referenced the WR set by Maurice Greene in '99 at 6.39m, but how many times did Greene run the 60m race in his career? How many times did Asafa Powell run the 60m? Usain Bolt? Tyson Gay? Did any legitimate elite-level runner focus on the 60m during the prime of his career?
Being a 60m champion is like being an ultra-marathon world champion. You may be winning races, but you're not going against the best runners in the world. You're going against guys who washed out in college or high school but still love to run and enjoy competition. I'd take any of the top 10 finishers in the NYC, Berlin, Chicago, London or Boston Marathon heads up against Scott Jurek, Timothy Olson, or any of the "elite" ultra-marathoners in the world.
Jon Drummon, Tim Harden, Marcus Brunson, Leonard Scott, Justin Gatlin all competed in the 60m. Not exactly wash outs.