Search results for query: *

@bobgeese You fuckers can insult all the Dems you want, but leave Chuck alone!

Uh oh, Wray cracked the hull of our narrative with his testimony today. Slap some rouge on Lindsay and get him babbling about the Steele Dossier on Hannity before Trump supporters can tell the difference!

Journalists don't require disclaimers on their articles Bob. ;) You know how your local affiliate will run a disclaimer before they run what appears to be a news shows that looks like it was filmed on a set in a Target break room in Peoria, about some medical miracle? That disclaimer means that...

The important thing for you to remember is that you tried your best!

By John Solomon, opinion contributor — 05/07/19 06:00 PM EDT 1,961{<jordan} "The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill"

<24>

My favorite video in the category of best poop joke or nut shot

<AckbarTrap> Before I take another long walk to nowhere and even read this, who wrote this and where did it appear? Then, if it checks out, I will forward it to Chris Wray to disabuse him of his misunderstanding.

You jumped into a discussion I was having with my old pal @bobgeese to be shitty about me calling Barr out for his atypical behavior as AG in defense of Trump's interests. I gave you, as an example, his interaction with Coons, and you gave me shit for not using my own words, so I did, and I...

Looks like you are not willing to risk sharing your bombshell secret sources on here right? It looks like you are privy to shit even Chris Wray hasn't seen <SelenaWow> FBI Director Chris Wray said Tuesday that he does not consider court-approved FBI surveillance to be “spying” and said he has...

As if you even read his post before you hollaed back and clicked like.

So you are bailing out on your previous points and are trying to change the subject to new territory? Yeah, it was time.<16> And Barr hasn't provided the full report to congress, that's kind of been a thing. And yeah, impeachment is the political remedy, and there are a lot of people who...

You tagged me for this? Cool story bro!

So now you are criticizing your own bombshell article for being too out of date to support the argument you are trying to make.<36>

Wow Bob, that was a long, long, several day walk for: "An Associated Press investigation of Mifsud’s career...doesn’t answer the key question of whether Mifsud was acting on behalf of Russian interests" and "Roh makes... unverified claims" "speculating that both Mifsud and Papadopoulos were...

I mean you would think that right?<Manning1>

Hollaback girl

You are just being redundant now and not addressing my questions. Come on, support specifically with what you previously highlighted that, you said, would make me "have his cake and eat it too".;) 1. That it was up to Barr to make the determination 2. That Mueller is "required" to accept Barr's...

What in there do you want me to focus on that, you think, supports your argument that Mifsud is an "FBI asset"? Help this dumbass out Bob, I read that: "An Associated Press investigation of Mifsud’s career has uncovered an international trail of mismanagement and financial problems stretching...

Break it down for me with each point, 1,2,3. <209Bitch>