Search results for query: *

That's true, I don't think it was ever intented for the model to be pro-pedophilia. In fact it seems to be a failure that the model didn't pick up on this being an extremely sensitive topic to begin with and shut the conversation down. But I do believe it's still the result of Google...

The thing is, the entire model is guardrailed, every prompt and every answer, because it has been finetuned. What you are talking about is the conversational scoping of the model ie. how you get it to not answer certain questions. Which is needed on top of finetuning the model. You need both...

Google handcrafts the responses by finetuning on the raw model. For starters, this is how you get the AI to not to tell you to kill yourself. But it's also how you steer the style of the responses. Googles finetuning is the reason for Gemini being so obsessed with "nuance" on every topic, which...

So you managed to read the title, good job. Have fun rageposting.

See this is just intellectual dishonesty, but go on?

Touch some grass buddy. This post comes across as deranged.

They disabled the feature, genius.

This is, unironically, exactly what is happening. Any type of guardrail and human reinforcement on the model fills it with logical inconsistensies and makes it worse, which is evident here. I'm sure Google wanted their model to give a more diverse output, but not like this. Which is having their...

That's why high-quality data is the key. Just crawling the internet to steal your shitposts isn't enough. If you have higher control over the curation of this data then the results will improve along it.

Video generation models as world simulators Now this the juicy stuff. This is how you get Terminators.

The most interesting about this giant leap in capability is that OpenAI used synthetic data, an AI captioner, to train the model. If we are not constrained by data generated by humans then the potential is endless. The fear has been that AI-generated data, like text, contains micro-errors that...

How should Israel have responded after the 7th october terror-attack that killed over 1200 israelis?

Israel didn´t blow up any hospital. There is only one actor who is at fault here and that is Hamas. It´s actually quite amazing how a video of Hamas breaking interntional law by using a hospital as a staging area, and Israel showing restraint by not hitting it, turns into a critique of Israel...

But Israel isn´t fighting an enemy that wants to meet them in an open field. Instead, like cowards and psychopaths, they embed themselves in important civilian infrastructure and the population. Hamas started the war, and sadly they are doing everything in their power to make the people of Gaza...

You put the responsibility on Israel. When it´s Hamas who uses a hospital for military actions, breaking both international law and makes the hospital lose its protected status.

But you can´t condemn Hamas for using a hospital for nefarious purposes.

The point of the video is that Israel didn´t blow up the entire building genius.... but instead allowed Hamas to use it for their terror-operations.

Israel in its current form is result of several failed wars of subjugation that the Arab League launched with Palestinian support. Israels population is largely made up of Jews ethnically cleansed from the Arab world under threat of violence.

This is what Israel has to contend with. An ISIS-like organisation using civilian infrastructure as staging points.

This is fucking stupid. It´s never supposed to be a "fair" fight.