Nobody asks to be called 'woman' in order to be spoken to. But putting that aside, accommodating peoples requests such as being asked to be referred to in a certain way has zero impact on anyone else's lives. I could go out my way to not accommodate them but what would be the advantage?
You're doing this weird dance around saying what you actually mean. Come out and say it if you'd like to discuss it.
Obviously we both know what you're unsubtly referring to. I'm just curious as to how extreme an example you need to use to look to, in order to justify not speaking to or referring to other people in the way they would like to be spoken to, as some kind of justification for being a cunt. I'm guessing you're about to take quite the leap.
I've posted my thoughts on tranny stuff before so I'll save you the time - it's mostly uninteresting to me as a topic and is simply culture war dogshit that gets thrown around by dipshits who are getting played by reactionary politicians as a distraction from the actual real issues we ought to be addressing in society.
I do find it funny that the facts don't care about your feelings crowd get their pantys in such a twist that they actively rush to the defence of the sanctity of women's sports, despite mocking it historically. But that's an aside.
If you think tranny issues are mega important as a political issue, then good for you I suppose. Reasonable accommodations seem like a very simple, non political issue in real life.
