A Higher Loyalty -- James Comey goes to war against Trump

JosephDredd

Gold Belt
@Gold
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
21,005
Reaction score
2
Excerpts are dropping in advance of the book's release.


http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/trump-told-comey-pee-tape-real-germaphobe-article-1.3930847

This article discusses Trump asking Comey whether he could investigate the pee tape to reassure Melania.


Trump told Comey pee tape can't be real because he's a germaphobe


He wanted to stop the leak.

President Trump told James Comey he would not have hired Russian prostitutes to pee on each other because he's a "germaphobe," according to a tell-all book by the axed FBI director.

Comey's upcoming memoir, "A Higher Loyalty," recounts a salacious conversation he had with Trump last January about the then-unreleased Steele dossier, a cache of documents alleging that the Russian government has compromising information on the President, including a "pee tape" featuring Trump and hookers in a Moscow hotel.

During their conversation at Trump Tower, Comey said Trump offered a series of explanations for why he would never instruct Russian hookers to urinate on each other.

He “strongly denied the allegations, asking — rhetorically, I assumed — whether he seemed like a guy who needed the service of prostitutes. He then began discussing cases where women had accused him of sexual assault, a subject I had not raised,” Comey said, according to an excerpt in the Washington Post.

He then tried to pour more cold water on the tale in a phone call to Comey a week later, insisting he hadn’t stayed overnight in the hotel room.

"I'm a germaphobe," Trump told Comey, according to his account. "There's no way I would let people pee on each other around me. No way."

“I decided not to tell him that the activity alleged did not seem to require either an overnight stay or even being in proximity to the participants,” Comey wrote
, according to the Post report.

The Steele dossier, which was made public weeks after the Trump Tower meet, claims that Trump had the hookers perform the lewd act in 2013 in the same Moscow hotel suite that President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama once stayed in "as a way of soiling the bed."

Trump asked Comey if the FBI could do anything to disprove the news reports he feared would leak from the unverified dossier, which was compiled by ex-British spy Christopher Steele.

During a one-on-one dinner at the White House after the dossier’s release, Trump raised the “golden showers thing” again, telling Comey that the steady stream of news stories about the alleged act was very painful for First Lady Melania Trump to read. Trump told Comey he wanted the FBI to prove the claim wasn’t true because it bothered him that there might be even "a one percent chance" his wife might think it's true, according to the book.

Comey writes that he was perplexed "why his wife would think there was any chance, even a small one, that he had been with prostitutes urinating on each other in a Moscow hotel room.”


...

Comey casts the President as a mafia boss-like figure who sought to blur the line between law enforcement and politics and tried to pressure him regarding his investigation into Russian election interference.

The ex-FBI director writes extensively about the first time he met Trump at his namesake Manhattan skyscraper.

Beyond Trump's "pee tape" denials, Comey and Trump discussed the intelligence community's findings about Russia's interference in the 2016 election. Comey was joined by National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers, CIA Director John Brennan and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.

Also present in the room were a number of Trump's incoming White House officials, including Vice President Mike Pence, chief of staff Reince Priebus, national security adviser Michael Flynn and press secretary Sean Spicer — all of whom, except Pence, have since left the administration.

Comey was stunned that the Trump officials in the room seemed unconcerned about the Kremlin's election meddling.

"They were about to lead a country that had been attacked by a foreign adversary, yet they had no questions about what the future Russian threat might be,” Comey writes. Instead, they launched into a strategy session about how to “spin what we’d just told them” for the public.

Full article at the link. It also discusses Comey's thoughts on his impact on Hillary's campaign.
 
7PzjTBd.gif
 
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/04/12/books/review/james-comey-a-higher-loyalty.html

James Comey Has a Story to Tell. It’s Very Persuasive.



In his absorbing new book, “A Higher Loyalty,” the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey calls the Trump presidency a “forest fire” that is doing serious damage to the country’s norms and traditions.

“This president is unethical, and untethered to truth and institutional values,” Comey writes. “His leadership is transactional, ego driven and about personal loyalty.”


Decades before he led the F.B.I.’s investigation into whether members of Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 election, Comey was a career prosecutor who helped dismantle the Gambino crime family; and he doesn’t hesitate in these pages to draw a direct analogy between the Mafia bosses he helped pack off to prison years ago and the current occupant of the Oval Office.

A February 2017 meeting in the White House with Trump and then chief of staff Reince Priebus left Comey recalling his days as a federal prosecutor facing off against the Mob: “The silent circle of assent. The boss in complete control. The loyalty oaths. The us-versus-them worldview. The lying about all things, large and small, in service to some code of loyalty that put the organization above morality and above the truth.” An earlier visit to Trump Tower in January made Comey think about the New York Mafia social clubs he knew as a Manhattan prosecutor in the 1980s and 1990s — “The Ravenite. The Palma Boys. Café Giardino.”

...

“A Higher Loyalty” also provides sharp sketches of key players in three presidential administrations. Comey draws a scathing portrait of Vice President Dick Cheney’s legal adviser David S. Addington, who spearheaded the arguments of many hard-liners in the George W. Bush White House; Comey describes their point of view: “The war on terrorism justified stretching, if not breaking, the written law.” He depicts Bush national security adviser and later Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as uninterested in having a detailed policy discussion of interrogation policy and the question of torture. He takes Barack Obama’s attorney general Loretta Lynch to task for asking him to refer to the Clinton email case as a “matter,” not an “investigation.” (Comey tartly notes that “the F.B.I. didn’t do ‘matters.’”) And he compares Trump’s attorney general, Jeff Sessions, to Alberto R. Gonzales, who served in the same position under Bush, writing that both were “overwhelmed and overmatched by the job,” but “Sessions lacked the kindness Gonzales radiated.”

Comey is what Saul Bellow called a “first-class noticer.” He notices, for instance, “the soft white pouches under” Trump’s “expressionless blue eyes”; coyly observes that the president’s hands are smaller than his own “but did not seem unusually so”; and points out that he never saw Trump laugh — a sign, Comey suspects, of his “deep insecurity, his inability to be vulnerable or to risk himself by appreciating the humor of others, which, on reflection, is really very sad in a leader, and a little scary in a president.”

...

Put the two men’s records, their reputations, even their respective books, side by side, and it’s hard to imagine two more polar opposites than Trump and Comey: They are as antipodean as the untethered, sybaritic Al Capone and the square, diligent G-man Eliot Ness in Brian De Palma’s 1987 movie “The Untouchables”; or the vengeful outlaw Frank Miller and Gary Cooper’s stoic, duty-driven marshal Will Kane in Fred Zinnemann’s 1952 classic “High Noon.”

One is an avatar of chaos with autocratic instincts and a resentment of the so-called “deep state” who has waged an assault on the institutions that uphold the Constitution.

The other is a straight-arrow bureaucrat, an apostle of order and the rule of law, whose reputation as a defender of the Constitution was indelibly shaped by his decision, one night in 2004, to rush to the hospital room of his boss, Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, to prevent Bush White House officials from persuading the ailing Ashcroft to reauthorize an N.S.A. surveillance program that members of the Justice Department believed violated the law.

One uses language incoherently on Twitter and in person, emitting a relentless stream of lies, insults, boasts, dog-whistles, divisive appeals to anger and fear, and attacks on institutions, individuals, companies, religions, countries, continents.

The other chooses his words carefully to make sure there is “no fuzz” to what he is saying, someone so self-conscious about his reputation as a person of integrity that when he gave his colleague James R. Clapper, then director of national intelligence, a tie decorated with little martini glasses, he made sure to tell him it was a regift from his brother-in-law.

One is an impulsive, utterly transactional narcissist who, so far in office, The Washington Post calculated, has made an average of six false or misleading claims a day; a winner-take-all bully with a nihilistic view of the world. “Be paranoid,” he advises in one of his own books. In another: “When somebody screws you, screw them back in spades.”

The other wrote his college thesis on religion and politics, embracing Reinhold Niebuhr’s argument that “the Christian must enter the political realm in some way” in order to pursue justice, which keeps “the strong from consuming the weak.”

Full article at link. This one really goes into the details of Comey's history and his thoughts on the election / investigation. It also talks about the time, as a child, Comey was taken hostage by a gunman.
 
If there is any justice in this world, Comey will end up in the clink for his crimes.
 
Maddow reads excerpts from the book:


 
Last edited:
If there is any justice in this world, Comey will end up in the clink for his crimes.
Comey did admit to leaking information on live television.

James Comey lives his life under the assumption of "the rules are for thee, not for me", and people wonder why everyone cheered when Stephen Colbert announced James Comey had been fired. Few firings have ever been more deserved than James Comey's.
 
Last edited:
More of Comey's sour grapes:


Is Comey rationalizing his firing by saying that working for the Trump admin couldn't have been productive? Or something to that effect?

Because sour grapes doesn't mean "jealous" or "angry" or "spiteful" or those kinds of things. It means that you failed to get the grapes, but you b.s. yourself that if you had gotten them, they would have been sour anyway.
 
Comey did admit to leaking information on live television.

James Comey lives his life under the assumption of "the rules are for thee, not for me", and people wonder why everyone cheered when Stephen Colbert announced James Comey have been fired. Few firings have ever been more deserved than James Comey's.

I wonder why he hasn't been charged for leaking. It seems like only Trump defenders know the law.
 
Is Comey rationalizing his firing by saying that working for the Trump admin couldn't have been productive? Or something to that effect?

Because sour grapes doesn't mean "jealous" or "angry" or "spiteful" or those kinds of things. It means that you failed to get the grapes, but you b.s. yourself that if you had gotten them, they would have been sour anyway.
Sour grapes over his long-lost pension and credibility
<Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo>
 
If there is any justice in this world, Comey will end up in the clink for his crimes.
I agree. He stole to 2016 presidential election from the Dems with his BULLSHIT memo.
 
The fact that people actually believe the whole pee tape thing without a shred of evidence while thinking they are above fake news is disconcerting.
 
The fact that people actually believe the whole pee tape thing without a shred of evidence while thinking they are above fake news is disconcerting.
People believe because of Christopher Steeles rep as the former head of MI6s Russian arm. Steele gathered raw intel from sources he accumulated over years working as a part of MI6.

For example, Sergei Skripal was an associate of a member of one of Steeles businesses . Skripal is named in the Steele report .The same Skripal who was attacked by Russians with a nerve agent.

While all of Steeles sources are not likely to be true seeing as how its raw data, some have already been verified independently . Also, Steeles work was being corroborated back in the US by the USIC.

So while we can't say for certain Steele is correct about the existence of a tape of sexual deviance, we know Steele to be more trustworthy than Russian troll farms who push false narratives to sow discord in American society
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...acd97698cef_story.html?utm_term=.4c517d855d55

Comey describes a Feb. 14, 2017, meeting in the Oval Office where Trump asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions to clear the room so he could bring up the FBI investigation of former national security adviser Michael Flynn directly with Comey — a key event in special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation of whether Trump sought to obstruct justice.

“I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go,” Trump said, according to Comey’s account of the meeting, some of which he first shared in Senate testimony last year. “He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.”

Comey writes that he regrets not interrupting Trump to explain that his plea was wrong. He recalls later confronting Sessions, whom he describes as “both overwhelmed and overmatched by the job.”

“You can’t be kicked out of the room so he can talk to me alone,” Comey told Sessions, according to the book. “You have to be between me and the president.”


Comey also recounts new observations: “Sessions just cast his eyes down at the table, and they darted quickly back and forth, side to side. He said nothing. I read in his posture and face a message that he would not be able to help me.”

...

After one week as president, Trump invited Comey to dinner. Comey describes the scene on Jan. 27: The table in the Green Room was set for two. The president marveled at the fancy handwriting on the four-course menu placards and seemed unaware of the term “calligrapher.” White House stewards served salad, shrimp scampi, chicken Parmesan with pasta, and vanilla ice cream.

Comey writes that he believed Trump was trying “to establish a patronage relationship,” and that he said: “I need loyalty. I expect loyalty.”

“I was determined not to give the president any hint of assent to this demand, so I gave silence instead,” Comey writes. “I stared at the soft white pouches under his expressionless blue eyes. I remember thinking in that moment that the president doesn’t understand the FBI’s role in American life.”


Trump broke the standoff by turning to other topics, Comey writes, speaking in torrents, “like an oral jigsaw puzzle,” about the size of his inauguration crowd, his free media coverage and the viciousness of the campaign. He talked about the Clinton email investigation as in three phases, as if it were a television series: “Comey One,” “Comey Two” and “Comey Three.” Trump also tried to convince Comey that he had not mocked disabled New York Times reporter Serge Kovaleski at a campaign rally, and then turned to the detailed allegations of sexual assault against him.

“There was no way he groped that lady sitting next to him on the airplane, he insisted,” Comey writes. “And the idea that he grabbed a porn star and offered her money to come to his room was preposterous.”

...

The two men were back together at the White House a couple weeks later. Comey had dropped by the chief of staff’s office to explain to Priebus — whom he describes as “both confused and irritated” — the appropriate way for the White House to interact with the FBI. When they finished, Priebus asked if Comey wanted to say hello to Trump — an ironic gesture, Comey recalls, considering he was just explaining the importance of the bureau’s independence.

Comey demurred, but Priebus insisted and brought him to the Oval Office, where Trump was stationed behind the Resolute Desk. The president, Comey recalls, “launched into one of his rapid-fire, stream-of-consciousness monologues” — this time about a recent Super Bowl interview with then-Fox News Channel personality Bill O’Reilly in which Trump complimented Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“But he’s a killer,” O’Reilly told Trump.

The president’s reply: “There are a ton of killers. We’ve got a lot of killers. What do you think? Our country’s so innocent?”

Trump fumed to Comey about the media criticism he received.

“I gave a good answer,” Trump said, according to Comey. “Really, it was a great answer. I gave a really great answer.”

Trump sought validation: “You think it was a great answer, right?”

Comey replied, “We aren’t the kind of killers that Putin is.”

Trump apparently did not take the correction well. Comey writes that the president’s eyes changed and his jaw tightened, and Priebus escorted him out.


The next month, Trump called Comey to complain about the Russia investigation as a “cloud” that was impairing his presidency and, again, brought up the Moscow prostitutes allegation.

“For about the fourth time, he argued that the golden showers thing wasn’t true, asking yet again, ‘Can you imagine me, hookers?’ ” Comey writes of their March 30, 2017, call. “In an apparent play for my sympathy, he added that he has a beautiful wife and the whole thing has been very painful for her. He asked what we could do to ‘lift the cloud.’ ”

Comey recalls telling the president the FBI was investigating it as quickly as possible, and that he had told Congress that Trump was not personally under investigation, to which the president repeatedly told him, “We need to get that fact out.”

Two weeks later, on April 11, Trump called Comey again to check on his request to “get out” that he is not under investigation, Comey writes.


“He seemed irritated with me,” Comey recalls.

“I have been very loyal to you, very loyal. We had that thing, you know,” Trump told him, according to the book, apparently referring to the loyalty dinner.

That was the last time the two men spoke. On May 9, as Comey was talking with FBI employees in the Los Angeles field office, he peered at a television screen and saw a news alert: “COMEY FIRED.”

Comey describes soon receiving an “emotional call” from John F. Kelly, then the Homeland Security secretary.

“He said he was sick about my firing and that he intended to quit in protest,” Comey writes. “He said he didn’t want to work for dishonorable people who would treat someone like me in such a manner.
I urged Kelly not to do that, arguing that the country needed principled people around this president. Especially this president.”

Full article at link.
 
Back
Top