Like i said:
Its all about the person,the Dedication,the amount of training,the exp and the skill of the school.
In my opinion it's also impossible to compare different ma with each other for simple reason:
they aren't the same ma,person's are not the same and the person's skill aren't the same.
For example Taekwondo vs MT,There are so many factors u can't say which is better
*Under what rules do they fight
*What skill level do they have
*How much do train,and how much talent do they have
*....
Wouldn't u rather have techniques of both to make u a better fighter than claim one or the other is better?
And so mma is born.
Well BJJ does make a difference since it takes so much time to promote from one belt to another. I think TKD is too acrobatic and Muay Thai is more effeciency oriented. I mean conditioning in Muay Thai makes a lot of it while technique in TKD makes almost all of it. I personally consider Muay Thai better but still that's just my opinion.
TKD acrobatics are for shows,i don't think much people would risk using that in competition.
I don't know what you mean with conditioning,is it to gain stamina?
If so it depends on the school,at least where i train the conditioning is very hard
