Do you ever live bet boxing? It is where I do my best by far.Patrick Wojcicki (-175) vs Marcelo Fabian Caceres $175.00 for $99.75
I wish I had more opportunity to do so, but U.S. bettors have almost zero options for live betting boxing except once in a while on very big bouts or if you have some backdoor access to Euro sportsbooks.Do you ever live bet boxing? It is where I do my best by far.
I compare the odds to what I am seeing and to what round by round scoring that is done online.
Nice I'm gonna tail for a small amount. Gl on ur other picks coming up soon too!I find women's MMA a lot more interesting than women's boxing, especially with the two minute rounds. But this upcoming women's middleweight unification bout on April 13th is a great opportunity for the gamblers out there with Christina Hammer inexplicably between a 3 to 1 and 4 to 1 underdog. No way should Claressa Shields be favored so widely against the more experienced taller champion with longer reach. I've got some money on Hammer between +325, +330 and +398 (3-way) for a nice payday if she pulls off the upset.
I'm waiting for the decision prop. No way Hammer KO's Shields.I find women's MMA a lot more interesting than women's boxing, especially with the two minute rounds. But this upcoming women's middleweight unification bout on April 13th is a great opportunity for the gamblers out there with Christina Hammer inexplicably between a 3 to 1 and 4 to 1 underdog. No way should Claressa Shields be favored so widely against the more experienced taller champion with longer reach. I've got some money on Hammer between +325, +330 and +398 (3-way) for a nice payday if she pulls off the upset.
I can't help but give my usual disclaimer about how it's foolish to only bet a prop and not the moneyline on a big underdog. I never agree with a statement that says "There's no way x wins by y method".I'm waiting for the decision prop. No way Hammer KO's Shields.
I agree with this. Not that i'm betting this fight but you're getting +270 around the place, is getting +300ish on a decision (guessing its open) really worth the risk? Not to me...I can't help but give my usual disclaimer about how it's foolish to only bet a prop and not the moneyline on a big underdog. I never agree with a statement that says "There's no way x wins by y method".
On ShoBox tonight:
Xavier Martinez/John Vincent Moralde Under 7½ (-108) $107.53 for $100.00
Mariusz Wach (262¼) vs Martin Bakole Ilunga (263½) weigh-in from earlier today for tomorrow's Poland card:
I could be over-reacting since I lost money backing Bakole last time against a much smaller opponent in Michael Hunter. But Wach is a very big man himself and only stopped by Miller other than the TKO via cuts against a savvy boxer like Povetkin. So unless you think Bakole is on the level of a Miller or Povetkin or holds so much power that he is going to be one of the only to stop Wach (possible) or somehow beat him by decision in Poland, I think the most likely outcome is Wach by decision or late T/KO if Bakole tires.Think Wach takes it?
I could be over-reacting since I lost money backing Bakole last time against a much smaller opponent in Michael Hunter. But Wach is a very big man himself and only stopped by Miller other than the TKO via cuts against a savvy boxer like Povetkin. So unless you think Bakole is on the level of a Miller or Povetkin or holds so much power that he is going to be one of the only to stop Wach (possible) or somehow beat him by decision in Poland, I think the most likely outcome is Wach by decision or late T/KO if Bakole tires.
I must be the only one on Bakole! Got him before the odds tightened up a little at +130.
I think Wach is years past his best, he's clearly been on the slide for years. I think Bakole is going to be the clearly fresher fighter, kind of similar to what "The Pin" managed to do against Wach last time out.