- Joined
- May 28, 2014
- Messages
- 174
- Reaction score
- 0
People will disagree, but I definitely like mitt work for my competitive fighters.
An overwhelming amount of our team training revolves around partner drills. When you have two partners who don't have fundamental knowledge of the drills they are doing, then what you have is the blind leading the blind. Practice doesn't make perfect, practice makes permanent.
There are a TON of videos online that show terrible mitt feeders. Cutesy "progressive style" mitt work where the coach slaps at the fighters hands, the fighter turns over zero punches, leaves their head dead center, has terrible posture, etc.
There are nearly as many videos out there of partner drills that also look like absolute dog shit, and it's because the people involved in the drill are not being directed by a coach.
When I feed mitts, I treat it very similar to a partner drill, except I'm the partner and I bring a level of knowledge and experience that can't be matched by a newer fighter. When I feed, I'm focusing on specific skills and techniques, so there is always a clear focus. Regardless of the direct focus, I can also work on things that are adjacent, but not directly worked on in the drill.
For example, if I'm working with a fighter on ranged combinations, I'll also be correcting their distance, their angles (cutting off the ring and not chasing), posture, ensuring they typically circle away from my power, passive head movement and feints, amongst other things. If I have this fighter partnered with a newer member working on ranged combinations, they could certainly do well with that specific focus, but can often lose sight of the rest of the fight game.
To mitigate this, coaches float around during partner drills to micromanage these things. Sharing the ring with a fighter, I often feel like I can explain some of the most subtle of nuances they wouldn't otherwise see.
The most common argument I hear is "Why not just do a partner drill with them then?", and it's valid, but also has it's shortcomings.
I have one guy who is 6'7" and 245 lbs. I'm just under 5'11" and about 160 lbs. I simply can't fully mimic what he would see in an opponent if I did a partner drill. Typically I'll hold paddles instead of mitts to help compensate for the aggressive size disparity.
Another thing that you get to do with pads that you can't always do with partner drills is throw things at full speed and with full power. Partner drills will focus on the defense of slips, rolls, distance, and angles, but our system uses a fair share of catching as well. Zero chance I'm gonna catch body shots at full speed from any of my fighters if I want sneeze without wanting to die the next day.
There are other benefits that I see, but I can respect those who choose not to use them. I can see the argument that are unnecessary, and to that I would say to each their own, but I really struggle when people insist that they "aren't" or "can't" be helpful for fighter development.
i actually think that mitts are more beneficial for beginners and still think they can be useful for fighters i just don't think they are 100% necesarry. im a big fan of using the body shield in combination with wearing gloves so that the fighters get a sort of meet in the middle between drills and sparring but can throw to the body full force like they would on pads or the bag. they get to react to punches coming at them not prerehearsed but not trying to hurt them and can learn to fight in and out of different ranges, circle away from the power hand and deal with a slightly more active defense than drills. although like you say this still relies on being a similar sort of size which for me at 5' 10'' 150lbs is an issue.