He will probably try to get into the women’s prison post-op.I'm all in favour of gender-affirming care for this individual.
Any idea why he'd opt for that over the chemical?This. The court can order chemical castration and the rapist can request to change it to physical castration.
How is this barbaric?Didn't know this was legal in the US. Video title said it was in "Lousisana" so I thought it was indeed happening in another country. Seems barbaric, but who is going to sympathize with a child rapist. Also, do they remove the entire sack or do they just get the nads and leave a big flap of skin hanging?
Because cutting off body parts as punishment for a crime sounds like some shit they do in third world countries. I haven't looked into it, but I suspect it's not 100% that castration would prevent future abuse. Guy never being around a kid would prevent 100% of abuse though. However, with all that being said, if you read my post you'd see where I have no sympathy for this guy getting clipped like the animal he is.How is this barbaric?
Hey, I don't mind getting child rapists together and giving them a nice meal and read them bedtime stories and all. As long as you castrate them when that is done then send them to prison. Hopefully the prisoners teach them some more life lessons.
Agree that castration isn't 100% foolproof. I think castration and 30 years should do it though, then parole for life.Because cutting off body parts as punishment for a crime sounds like some shit they do in third world countries. I haven't looked into it, but I suspect it's not 100% that castration would prevent future abuse. Guy never being around a kid would prevent 100% of abuse though. However, with all that being said, if you read my post you'd see where I have no sympathy for this guy getting clipped like the animal he is.
I do believe in vengeance/vandetta but I think that the State should never be involved in inflicting physical punishment. But again, this is a case where the convict has negative value i.e. a rodent, so fuck him.Some people deserve to be tortured
Because cutting off body parts as punishment for a crime sounds like some shit they do in third world countries. I haven't looked into it, but I suspect it's not 100% that castration would prevent future abuse. Guy never being around a kid would prevent 100% of abuse though. However, with all that being said, if you read my post you'd see where I have no sympathy for this guy getting clipped like the animal he is.
Did you miss the other part of my post where I said he should never be allowed to be around a child again as that would completely eliminate the possibility for abuse? Did you also miss multiple posts where I said that I have no sympathy for this guy getting castrated? I ask these questions because you are trying to make it sound like I am anti castration and pro child abuse. In reality I said it sounds barbaric because it does. Didn't say I thought it shouldn't happen though.The sex crime recidivism rate for offenders without chemical or physical castration is 50%. With castration it's around 3%. It's very effective, and it's the only treatment that exists for pedophilia.
Your argument seems to boil down to "Well it's not 0% so it's not even worth making the reoffending rate go down by 47%..." Yeah, that logic doesn't make any sense. That 47% is thousands of children saved from horror every year in the US.
- Same. When clicking in the thread i thought maybe be another country. Never read about this punition!Didn't know this was legal in the US. Video title said it was in "Lousisana" so I thought it was indeed happening in another country. Seems barbaric, but who is going to sympathize with a child rapist. Also, do they remove the entire sack or do they just get the nads and leave a big flap of skin hanging?
The sex crime recidivism rate for offenders without chemical or physical castration is 50%. With castration it's around 3%. It's very effective, and it's the only treatment that exists for pedophilia.
Your argument seems to boil down to "Well it's not 0% so it's not even worth making the reoffending rate go down by 47%..." Yeah, that logic doesn't make any sense. That 47% is thousands of children saved from horror every year in the US.
Does this seem like a bridge too far