Okay, so judges should judge only after fighters come out of the hospital and get all the checks done.Cuts are often superficial and bare no real impact on a fight, they should be judged according to the significance they have. The fact that it's simply "visible" doesn't make it more significant, meanwhile guys bones break and ligaments tear and you don't see it. Bodies get broken down with kicks and punches cumulatively but have a far more significant impact than a shiner below the eye. Guys get injured from takedowns all the time too but it's often not visual. But I agree a takedown should be it's own reward, what you do with the advantage of gravity and the control it brings is what should typically matter the most, if you're getting elbowed by the guy on bottom and he's attacking for subs while you're just tapping short punches to not get stood up, you should not win the round because of the takedown and being on top. But cuts are not usually significant.
I don't really care what Cruz says, 26 media outlets scored it for Yan and 1 scored it for O'Malley. The fact that Yan was bleeding doesn't mean he rightfully lost unless he makes Omalley bleed too, that's fucking moronic.
Cruz has been very omnipresent with his remarks after this ppv. I bet all that BW attention has him wanting to get back in there.
Make takedowns not count for anything
It’s about what you do before and after that scores
Explaining why Yan lost to O’malley. Fans think it is robbery but based on the new judging rules O’malley won as he was cutting up Yan's face more.
He said that nowadays he would rather fake takedowns and use that to elbow/knee his opponents than take them to the ground.
Thoughts? Is that a good direction for MMA?
Explaining why Yan lost to O’malley. Fans think it is robbery but based on the new judging rules O’malley won as he was cutting up Yan's face more.
He said that nowadays he would rather fake takedowns and use that to elbow/knee his opponents than take them to the ground.
Thoughts? Is that a good direction for MMA?
Explaining why Yan lost to O’malley. Fans think it is robbery but based on the new judging rules O’malley won as he was cutting up Yan's face more.
He said that nowadays he would rather fake takedowns and use that to elbow/knee his opponents than take them to the ground.
Thoughts? Is that a good direction for MMA?
Cuts are often superficial and bare no real impact on a fight, they should be judged according to the significance they have. The fact that it's simply "visible" doesn't make it more significant, meanwhile guys bones break and ligaments tear and you don't see it. Bodies get broken down with kicks and punches cumulatively but have a far more significant impact than a shiner below the eye. Guys get injured from takedowns all the time too but it's often not visual. But I agree a takedown should be it's own reward, what you do with the advantage of gravity and the control it brings is what should typically matter the most, if you're getting elbowed by the guy on bottom and he's attacking for subs while you're just tapping short punches to not get stood up, you should not win the round because of the takedown and being on top. But cuts are not usually significant.
I don't really care what Cruz says, 26 media outlets scored it for Yan and 1 scored it for O'Malley. The fact that Yan was bleeding doesn't mean he rightfully lost unless he makes Omalley bleed too, that's fucking moronic.