You’re like two steps away from gas chambers.Well, yes. It would be replacing the slums with something decent. It could be rich neighborhoods it could be middle class neighborhoods. Just not slums. Slums bring down the value of everything and make everywhere less safe.
I'm sure there are decent people living in slums as well, but this is about the greater good. You could have clean safe cities just by removing the areas that bring the cities down.
Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat itI've explained this at length in another thread. There should be a small amount of well built government housing that is closely regulated and the number of government housing available should be tied to the number of low income jobs available. By keeping the amount of government housing low and tied available low income jobs and requiring inhabitants to have a clean record and be employed, you keep crime low.
I was thinking the same about the anchor dude.I'd like to see that anchorwoman in booty shorts, doing stiff-legged deadlifts.
Maybe we can pool our money and get the anchorman to have "mammary intercourse" with the anchorwoman on air. I got...I was thinking the same about the anchor dude.
Maybe we can pool our money and get the anchorman to have "mammary intercourse" with the anchorwoman on air. I got...
Tree fiddy.
Thanks for your support, brother! Maybe if we get enough, we can get the anchorman, the anchorwoman and my girl Alex Livingston to have a treesome.Put me down for tree fiddy too
Nothing you are saying makes any sense.It's a tragedy. It's an avoidable tragedy though. There are ways to fix this problem.
Feel like there's more to the story... How we know the old man is not involved in some kind of criminal activity? Random dude try murder him in broad daylight, something is definitely sketchy.
Well damOld guy got carjacked and made him drive all the way to his house so he can steal all his shit.
Nothing you are saying makes any sense.
A predator will always be able to drive from the ghetto into a neighbourhood like this. You cannot just say move the entire ghetto further and the person makes the drive and then move it again.
The town requires most of the peaceful citizens from the ghetto to come into the towns to work. Most need to be close enough to take public transit.
You are not offering any solution.
That is not what I said. And that is not you said.Are you saying that there is no amount of distance you could move the ghetto to that would reduce the amount of crime? I think don't think thst is accurate.
Cities are high demand areas. My suggestion would be to completely tear down the existing ghettos, and replace a smaller section with subsidized housing that would meet the needs of businesses that required low income workers. Tie the number of available units to the number of available jobs. This would reduce visible blight, limit the number of low income people to a manageable level, and attract higher quality people to live in the he subsidized area. Furthermore, you could create more restrictions on the low income people that do live in your subsidized housing. You could require a clean criminal background for the entire household, require they be actively employed, require a minimum level of education, require that only married couples can have children. You can have enhanced surveillance and record when they enter and leave. You can station police nearby. There's a lot you can do that isn't being done now. Since subsidized housing is a benefit being given by the government, you can attach a lot of strings to it.
Looks like Armondo met the long stick of the law.
What's your solution?That is not what I said. And that is not you said.
You are the one with the absolute position. That simply moving the ghetto further would be an easy fix for this. That instances where this guy, seemingly traveled some distance to get into this neighbourhood would suddenly stop as the guy would look and say 'too far to drive'. You are proposing there is a magic distance.
But beyond that is the nonsense of the position that you can simply tear down ghettos and match perfectly 'jobs to homes' while getting rid of the rest of the people and then using your enhanced techniques to control them.
You don't seem to have any comprehension that the remainder of the ghetto people pushed away from society and any ability to generate income will become increasingly desperate and thus be more likely to travel to commit crime.
Your solutions are all so child like and wrong that I think you are either trolling or have the mental facility of a 7 year old thinking you have a smart solution when nothing you say would work.
it is all just nonsense and since I will assume you are trolling (and smarter than you appear in these posts) I will let it go.