- Joined
- Jun 6, 2010
- Messages
- 46,857
- Reaction score
- 29,154
It depends on the workplace. I've seen a lot of places across different fields use the "public warning"I dunno, I thought what Dana said on that could have been interpreted as just saying what he thought the Media wanted to hear...
If he'd have said anything less professional he would have looked ridiculous... Imagine the outrage(From both the commission and fans) if he'd said "Yeah I tend to take my employee's side on things like this, I have their back, Herb was wrong".. He's seemingly never taken any issue with other commentators shouting at Refs or Judges so I don't believe he cares that much, he's also pretty open to shitting on people and didn't with Dan in that incident so there's also that..
Yeah that's happened to me as well in the workplace "we need to make sure" instead "X needs to make sure .." That's not a disciplinary warning though, disciplinary warnings are officially recorded, not just assumed with words, they are private and typically very very formal.. There is usually a strike system, 2,3 strikes and your out, said recorded disciplinaries expire after a certain amount of months typically from my experience.
Yes, it doesn't officially go on your record but that's not a necessity. Unless you're union or under a well negotiated contract, it's easy to discipline or fire employees. They have pretty limited recourse, really. I've seen jobs go from "unofficial" warnings to the first step of official warnings, on down the line.
I've also seen jobs go directly from an unofficial warning to suspension or even termination. Many places don't give much of a fuck about the possiblity of an employee collecting unemployment for a bit. These are large, wealthy companies that will take a temporary loss if needed, to get someone they feel is disruptive out of there.