- Joined
- Sep 24, 2007
- Messages
- 51,264
- Reaction score
- 21,260
They don't care about volatility either. The collateral requirements were just high and the amount of new smooth brain buyers was literally unprecedented. They needed more liquidity to cover the collateral required.
They make their money per transaction. It's entirely in their interest to let unprecedented numbers of new buyers buy whatever they want.
They care about volatility insomuch as that crazy price spike is what led to their cash being squeezed. So maybe "volatility" isn't the perfect word, but the insanely fast runup is something they weren't ready for. For sure they want buyers to be able to buy if possible, but they don't want them piling into one equity and driving the price so high that (as you said) they can't meet the cash requirements to cover the collateral. With a slow climb, they don't get squeezed like that because the other assets being bought and sold cover whatever cash they need.
So yeah, we basically agree other than that maybe I played a little fast and loose with the word "volatility". If the price was spiking up but then crashing and it was a yo yo, I guess they'd have the cash they needed because they'd have the influx when it was sold.
I'm far from an expert in this stuff. I have a rudimentary understanding, but that's it.