- Joined
- Sep 21, 2009
- Messages
- 13,890
- Reaction score
- 11,829
Genetically fugly.
I had a close call walking home from school one time. A neighbor left the fence in the front of his yard open and two Rottweilers got out circling me, barking and trying to jump at me. Thankfully there was a guy trimming a tree across the street that was able to get their attention towards him so I was able to book it out of there and get home. I would have been fucked if both of them got a hold of me. Yeah I don't fucking trust Rottweilers just like Pitbulls.I don't blame you. They are a highly capable and scary breed.
Those dogs are typically aggressive towards threatening animals, as they were bred to protect flocks. They usually aren't aggressive towards people. They can certainly fuck a person up if they wanted to, they just aren't as psycho as Pits.P4P? Maybe.
Absolute? No chance. As others have stated, there are plenty if much larger/stronger dogs, who were specifically bred to be aggressive and territorial. Caucasian Shepherds, Kangals, Dogo's, Canes, etc. There's just not millions of those dogs around.
My understanding
Poor socially stunted people on the internet. Can't seem to open a conversation without trying to start a bitch fight. Goodbye.Does that mean things you read on the Google?
Poor socially stunted people on the internet. Can't seem to open a conversation without trying to start a bitch fight. Goodbye.
See that's what I'm talking about. Like you pointed out, if they decided to attack you, you'd be dead. Owners like that need to be prosecuted to the fullest length for that negligence and the dogs euthanized.I had a close call walking home from school one time. A neighbor left the fence in the front of his yard open and two Rottweilers got out circling me, barking and trying to jump at me. Thankfully there was a guy trimming a tree across the street that was able to get their attention towards him so I was able to book it out of there and get home. I would have been fucked if both of them got a hold of me. Yeah I don't fucking trust Rottweilers just like Pitbulls.
Granted, every breed has sweethearts but they are usually obvious when they are friendly.
A big Cane Corso could bite a pit right in half
Easy
- I had a similar experience.I had a close call walking home from school one time. A neighbor left the fence in the front of his yard open and two Rottweilers got out circling me, barking and trying to jump at me. Thankfully there was a guy trimming a tree across the street that was able to get their attention towards him so I was able to book it out of there and get home. I would have been fucked if both of them got a hold of me. Yeah I don't fucking trust Rottweilers just like Pitbulls.
Granted, every breed has sweethearts but they are usually obvious when they are friendly.
They present the greatest danger overall.
The world is full of guys with small dicks that are trying to compensate, that is why so many of these are in shelters; they get pit bulls to look like a tough guy and end up taking them to shelters or leaving them on the streets.
The fighting aspect of these dogs actually does increase their aggression both behaviorally and genetically. The idea that you can't breed for aggression is wrong. If you want a trait, you can breed for it by breeding dogs repeatedly that show that trait over multiple generations. That's the way animals were domesticated and bred for specific traits to begin with, including dogs.
Getting a pit from a shelter is dangerous IMO because you never know what you are going to get. Pretty sure even the most potentially aggressive dog can be socialized well if you get them as a small pup, but you never know what people did to it before you got it at a shelter. My understanding is that with a previously poorly socialized, aggressive pit, no amount of testing will tell you for sure that the dog isn't going to fly off the handle and attack someone later.
So all the dogs listed have varying levels of gameness. Gameness is a willingness to die in a fight. Out of the dogs listed I'd say it's a toss up between the Tosa Inu and the Pitbull for the most gamey.
The pitbull has that going for it with regard to it's "genetics" once it's set off, they just don't stop. You can crack a baseball bat over its head and it will keep coming at you. But thats the terrier in it coming through. The Tosa has terrier blood as well.
Oddly enough it's mostly right wing people who usually complain about pitbulls being allowed to exist from what I see. I agree though, I like pitbulls tooIIRC, something like 90%+ of attacks are from intact males. My pitbull is fixed and 15 years old now, and he's attacked nobody. I'm also a member of the central South Dakota chapter of Patriots for Pitties, and no one's dog in that group or in any group we've ever worked with has attacked a soul.
People who want to ban pitbulls also want to ban guns. Molon labe, motherfuckers
Inspired by this thread.
Social - Dog of Peace Fatally Mauls 3-Month-Old Baby, Injures Mother in NJ
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/03/11/dog-kills-baby-injures-mother-new-jersey/72932832007/ The latest pitbull fatality in the US. I thought it was just memes but they really seem to attack children frequently.forums.sherdog.com
I know people are going to say smaller dogs tend to bite more, that maybe true, but their bites are nothing close to what damage a Pitbull can do.
So therefore I believe Pitbulls and their types are the most dangerous dogs that's out there. They have enough bite force to inflict enough damage that can maim or kill grown adults.
I know some or most would say it's the owner fault Pitbulls are acting in this behaviour. But these same owners buy other types of breed of dogs, but you don't see as much carnage you see Pitbulls inflict on it's community.
I think they are naturally very aggressive and considering their size and strength it's a very dangerous lethal combination.
If you are willing to buy these type of animals, be certain of the consequences or worst case scenarios of owning these type of dogs.
That's just my thoughts on it.
No they are just misunderstood love pets who also happen to feed on people.Inspired by this thread.
Social - Dog of Peace Fatally Mauls 3-Month-Old Baby, Injures Mother in NJ
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/03/11/dog-kills-baby-injures-mother-new-jersey/72932832007/ The latest pitbull fatality in the US. I thought it was just memes but they really seem to attack children frequently.forums.sherdog.com
I know people are going to say smaller dogs tend to bite more, that maybe true, but their bites are nothing close to what damage a Pitbull can do.
So therefore I believe Pitbulls and their types are the most dangerous dogs that's out there. They have enough bite force to inflict enough damage that can maim or kill grown adults.
I know some or most would say it's the owner fault Pitbulls are acting in this behaviour. But these same owners buy other types of breed of dogs, but you don't see as much carnage you see Pitbulls inflict on it's community.
I think they are naturally very aggressive and considering their size and strength it's a very dangerous lethal combination.
If you are willing to buy these type of animals, be certain of the consequences or worst case scenarios of owning these type of dogs.
That's just my thoughts on it.
TBH I think that the level of typical pitbull owners make this a non partisan issue. I wouldn't be surprised if most pitbull owners never voted.Oddly enough it's mostly right wing people who usually complain about pitbulls being allowed to exist from what I see. I agree though, I like pitbulls too