- Joined
- Dec 18, 2013
- Messages
- 21,835
- Reaction score
- 32,120
You don’t know thatThat said - they're all on some shit. Every single one of them. Always have been, always will be.
You don’t know thatThat said - they're all on some shit. Every single one of them. Always have been, always will be.
They are serious. These idiots are real, as depressing as that is.Not sure if serious. You realise they "enhance performance" and that its cheating. Mind blown. Cheating is ok on sherdog.
Well, he was juicing for years, and they at least contributed to the reflexes he had. So, yes.No amount of steroids can give the reflexes he had. So, no.
Stupidest post of the week, you made it with only one day left!I don't hold it against them. You do your time and it's a clean slate. If you're going to hold it against Jon then you have to hold it against TJ, silva, Ortega, Diaz, gastelum. Thc is against the rules just like roids
He has ALWAYS been popular since his first UFC fight. Are you trying to be racist, dumb, or both?I have always thought Anderson was too harshly criticized for getting popped late in his career because he had so many haters that wanted him nowhere near the GOAT table that he had so clearly earned a seat at the discussion for.
In reality, he fought a ton of top guys that also used as some point, and almost all of the people at the GOAT table (from within his era of dominance) had used and been caught for something, at some point. Legends and champs use PEDs. It's always been part of the game. If you are taking out every athlete that has ever cheated or used a PED, there is almost nobody left. Anderson is not different, but he gets treated like a demon because people hated him so much because he wasn't the popular white, English fluent savior the meat head fans love so much.
I didn't say he didn't have fan. Look how old my account is. I was there, man. I said he had very spiteful haters that made no secret that they disliked a foreign, non English speaking champ making a fool of the division. Back then, nobody was woke and people were pretty openly racist all the time.He has ALWAYS been popular since his first UFC fight. Are you trying to be racist, dumb, or both?
I take back my reply to @humdizzle. You just won stupidest post of the week!I didn't say he didn't have fan. Look how old my account is. I was there, man. I said he had very spiteful haters that made no secret that they disliked a foreign, non English speaking champ making a fool of the division. Back then, nobody was woke and people were pretty openly racist all the time.
Late 2010-early 2011. Do all the mental gymnastics you want there. Also, every fighter ever wasn't dumb enough to have PEDs in their house on camera.
I posted a video of it in plain sight. YEARS before the leg break. Please keep up, this is old news.
You don’t know that
How do you know that?Yes, I do. It's mandatory at the highest level. This sport was built on juice, boys.
Holy shit, are you for real with this?You, unsurprisingly, failed to comprehend what I was saying.
The video you cling to is indecisive speculation. He didn't piss hot until after the leg break.
Yes, I do. It's mandatory at the highest level. This sport was built on juice, boys.
How do you know that?
Holy shit, are you for real with this?
No, I don't care that he did PEDs, I think most guys were on PEDs back then, I just don't agree when people make these claims that everyone was/is on PEDs when it's just an assumption based on nothing but their own common sense logicIt is known.
If you understand that he was able to pass tests while taking something, then you understand that every other fighter in history was also capable of doing so.
You're trying to condemn Silva to a career of PED use based on one failed test at the end of his career, right? If that is so, you have to acknowledge that not pissing hot doesn't equate to clean. Even for your favey.
No, I don't care that he did PEDs, I think most guys were on PEDs back then, I just don't agree when people make these claims that everyone was/is on PEDs when it's just an assumption based on nothing but their own common sense logic
Especially in the USADA era, do you think everyone is still on PEDs? If so do you have any type of reason/evidence beyond you just know?
It's mandatory. Very well known. Microdosing is more common now, but the cheaters are always ahead of the testers. Not popping doesn't equate to clean.
"It's mandatory. Very well known"It's mandatory. Very well known. Microdosing is more common now, but the cheaters are always ahead of the testers. Not popping doesn't equate to clean.
If so do you have any type of reason/evidence beyond you just know?
So basically if your really good,it's ok to use them. Got it.No amount of steroids can give the reflexes he had. So, no.
PEDs are a plague upon combat sports, no question. USADA testing has done a great job at cleaning up the vast majority of the sport.
And I'd say they're a relevant issue in all discussion about the P4P GOATs, though I don't take the discussions too seriously. They're just fun.
But I'm curious what the general consensus of Anderson Silva's positive PED test after the Nick Diaz fight.
[Go ahead and vote in the poll above, if your opinion is already solidified]
Lets look back exactly what he tested positive for -
https://www.mmafighting.com/2015/2/...-tested-positive-for-two-types-of-performance
"Anderson Silva not only tested positive for Drostanolone metabolites in a Jan. 9 out-of-competition drug test, but traces of the banned substance Androstane were also found within the legendary champion's system, according to Nevada Athletic Commission (NAC) executive director Bob Bennett.
Drostanolone is a common form of anabolic steroid. Androstane is a form of endogenous steroid hormone. Both substances are banned according to World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) code."
That's pretty cut and dry, right? If you're of the opinion that any PEDs positive test throws into question if the fighter was always on PEDs and this was just the first time they got caught. And Silva was not using an obscure PED that no one knew about, but a steroid & steroid hormone. Two PEDs.
But there's a sympathetic argument towards this not harming his legacy. Before the Diaz fight, this happened to him 14 months before -
Given the fact he went through THAT - possibly the most painful injury in combat sports - & an entire year of recovery that went into his fight camp for Diaz... its kinda understandable he'd take anything to aid in the healing [though if steroids aid in healing what injuries is another topic].
And he's never tested positive for anything before, or since.
So what's your opinion?