- Joined
- Apr 15, 2007
- Messages
- 23,867
- Reaction score
- 5,927
Wtf are you on about? When did I say I know nothing about indictments againt him? Wtf?You're arguing to defend Trump for reasons only you know (ROFL) while you claim to know absolutely nothing about any of the indictments against him. What the fuck is the point of even talking to you then?
You can't counter any of the points put to you. You can't point to any specific error being made by the justice system that suggests this double standard you have imagined actually exists. You have less than nothing to support your argument. So, you're a complete waste of time and space ITT. Fuck off then, why don't you?
I've already said it. The Carrol case was a joke and didn't meet even the standard of preponderance of the evidence. It's why no one can argue that it did without using some kind of evidence outside the actual trial.