- Joined
- Jan 31, 2009
- Messages
- 12,296
- Reaction score
- 5,112
It's ok. Let him give advice. If anyone ever follows this fool, they surely deserve the loss.You are not very, very informed. And you should never, ever give anyone betting advice again.
It's ok. Let him give advice. If anyone ever follows this fool, they surely deserve the loss.You are not very, very informed. And you should never, ever give anyone betting advice again.
Actually.... You postulated two very disparate opinions....
Francis is either @ -150/-200 or -900.... Pick one.... You can't have it both ways mate.
Ignorant troll gonna troll right?
Hey hey, leave Mongolia out of this mess.TS....
So first you claim that Francis should be a -150 to -200 favorite?
Then you claim Game only has a 10% chance of winning the fight?
The only thing that you have is established is that you are:
An absolute mongoloid who knows absolutely nothing about fight odds
Do you wear a helmet before boarding the short bus every morning?
It's ok. Let him give advice. If anyone ever follows this fool, they surely deserve the loss.
It's ok. Let him give advice. If anyone ever follows this fool, they surely deserve the loss.
Did you buy a 07 account?Will make sure to bump this when I cash on the $500 bet.
More then 10% chance he taps out the second the bell rings to get out of that slave contractI would put that at a 10% chance of happening
Actually his thinking on Francis being a value bet is fair as I'm sure plenty of sharps will bet on that line. Even thinking he should be - 150 to - 200 isn't egregious. It's his misplaced hubris from having no clue how to actually handicap a fight when he adds in gane should be +900 is what is super comical as those two views are basically diametrically opposed to each other
This guys signature actually says "an intellectual mind"
Someone with this level of stupidity
Which part isn't true. That you claim francis should be around - 200 or that gane should be at %10?
Genuinely curious where you think everyone is wrong on things you clearly wrote
I've already explained it 3 times in this thread.
Anyway, you admitted that my thread has sound reasoning and that Francis is a good value bet. You should put a couple hundred down on it.
You actually haven't explained anything about how you come to the illogical reasoning that Francis should be - 200 AND Gane should be at +900. As someone already said, you can have one of those but not both
You know it's totally possible that the bookmakers would make someone's odds around +150ish and an individual can have the opinion that they have a 10% chance of winning, correct? Do I need to dumb it down more for you?
That's what everyone is doing, laughing at your opinion of gane at 10% while thinking Francis should be at - 200.
You get that right or do you need even more people laughing at how dumb that is?
It's actually insane how dense you are.
I'm not the one with the opinion Francis should be at -200 (67% chance of winning) and Gane has a 10% (+900) of winning where they are the only 2 people in the cage.
False equivalence is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone incorrectly asserts that two or more things are equivalent despite the fact that there are also notable differences between them.
Agreed.
Mathematical logic also states you can't have an opinion that Francis should be a -200 favorite (67% probability) and Gane has a 10% probablity and except people not to laugh. Those two opinions cant hold up when put together.