- Joined
- Oct 3, 2020
- Messages
- 12,553
- Reaction score
- 11,350
Yeah I'm fine. Prove to me that the dating is accurate. They will tell you themselves it isn't. So yes I'm fine, are you ok?You ok man?
Yeah I'm fine. Prove to me that the dating is accurate. They will tell you themselves it isn't. So yes I'm fine, are you ok?You ok man?
Yee I’m doing great thanks for asking.Yeah I'm fine. Prove to me that the dating is accurate. They will tell you themselves it isn't. So yes I'm fine, are you ok?
My guess agnosticWhat's GSP's opinion on religion, philosophy, aliens, reality and all that good stuff?
Can anyone pour forth an extremely detailed answer to this? The more detail the better.
Prove that it's wrong..provide your methodology and put it against the hard data that scientists have right now.The dating they use on dinosaur bones isn't accurate at all. It could honestly be completely wrong and way off. They test the fossils around the bones and if dinosaurs really got killed off from a comet/meteor or something else that affected the whole planet it could definitely affect the surrounding environment as well. Rocks and other fossils could be flying all over the place or the effect of the blast could've aged the fossils more than normal from the extreme heats on the planet. They tell you all the time the dating they use isn't accurate. So I don't know why people choose to believe that timeline without questioning it because it could be completely wrong.
It's wrong because they tell you themselves it isn't accurate. That's your proof right there. They will tell you it isn't accurate and they are guessing. That's why I said to prove that it's accurate, because they have never proved anything to be accurate at all. They give estimates to what it might be from fossils/rocks around the bones. But the methods they use isn't accurate at all. They even state that, but people don't seem to pay attention.Prove that it's wrong..provide your methodology and put it against the hard data that scientists have right now.
Prove that it's wrong..provide your methodology and put it against the hard data that scientists have right now.
Do you have a link of scientists saying this?It's wrong because they tell you themselves it isn't accurate. That's your proof right there. They will tell you it isn't accurate and they are guessing.
I don't know what this gif means lol
The entire thing applies to the threadThis should be a crime. No timestamp.
I don't know what this gif means lol
Who me? Why would you think that? I was just curious.what, are you trying to decide if you like him based on who he is as a person, and youre already bringing in religion, youre fucked
Must be a movie reference. I don't get this gif.
They are def not all catholic,and that was a stupid thing for him to say.He is Catholic, at least to some degree. In the photo below, he is wearing a cross. He has done the sign of the cross gesture as well before fights.
About 75% of Québécois identify as Catholic. Although, the current premier of Quebec controversially maintains that all French Canadians are Catholic.
Again, do you have link to scientists saying this? This doesn't sound like an accurate description of radiometric dating. Just because it has limitations, doesn't mean it's inaccurate.It's wrong because they tell you themselves it isn't accurate. That's your proof right there. They will tell you it isn't accurate and they are guessing. That's why I said to prove that it's accurate, because they have never proved anything to be accurate at all. They give estimates to what it might be from fossils/rocks around the bones. But the methods they use isn't accurate at all. They even state that, but people don't seem to pay attention.
What the shit is this.The dating they use on dinosaur bones isn't accurate at all. It could honestly be completely wrong and way off. They test the fossils around the bones and if dinosaurs really got killed off from a comet/meteor or something else that affected the whole planet it could definitely affect the surrounding environment as well. Rocks and other fossils could be flying all over the place or the effect of the blast could've aged the fossils more than normal from the extreme heats on the planet. They tell you all the time the dating they use isn't accurate. So I don't know why people choose to believe that timeline without questioning it because it could be completely wrong.