They're not the ones who condescendingly dismissed the study with rhetorical questions that were answered in the very study one is so effetely accusing others of not reading. That would be you. You just did it, here, again.
Or Kong
or Skold
Homer , Hollywood nicky, the guy from holland some deranged lefty that can’t take a hint
That's quite the conspiracy. Unfortunately, your timeline is way off. Strange, since you obviously found his wiki - to find what awards he won. Harvard received complaints against him and his research lab was shutdown over a year before he published this paper.Lol, so the tenured Harvard professor who's been there for nearly 20 years, authored 50 papers, awarded a MacArthur genius fellowship and John Bates Clark medal, by pure coincidence, just happened to be accused of the only misconduct that requires no evidence and had his lab shut down right after publishing a paper debunking a racial grift? Did he also run a gang rape ring in high school and shout "this is MAGA country"?
Indeed. If we are going to speculate about motives surrounding his dismissal, it would appear far more likely that the overwhelmingly liberal staff at Harvard, deeply chagrined by the truth that Fryer's study honestly conveyed, formed a conspiracy to weaponize #metoo against the man to demean him, and hopefully his study by extension.
Probably explains why some of his colleagues didn't think he should publish the study. 10 cities leaves out a whole lot of nuance and variation. The experience of people in small towns, different cultural areas of the U.S., the difference of policing in mixed areas vs largely white or largely black areas....the fact that it's a one study claiming the opposite of what dozens of other studies have claimed....the list goes on.You should really bother actually reading articles instead of just headlines and immediately rushing to reaffirm your biases that already existed
Here's an admission from the study itself
"There are no systematic datasets which include officer involved shootings along with demographics, encounter characteristics, and suspect and police behavior. We compile a data set on officer-involved shootings from ten locations across America"
God DAMN - that's a pretty fucking big problem with the study's design isn't it? They don't have a dataset on officer involved shootings that includes demographics??? They compiled their own data from 10 American cities? Who is doing that compiling? What data are they selecting?
Tell me you've never stepped foot in a college classroom without telling me you've never stepped foot in a college classroom
"Hurr durrrr, me see headline that confirms what I already believe. Me believe headline instantly"
Nope. He published the paper in 2016, first complaint was right after in 2017, they had their kangaroo court meetings and it was shut down in 2019, by you guessed it, race grifter, DEI hire and noted plagiarist Claudine Gay, who was Dean of the arts and sciences department at the time.
There were multiple investigations. The first one found he violated university policy on several occasions. They have text messages, where he's asking female colleagues if they're jerking anyone off tonight, so hard to claim he's being framed here.
That was a second investigation, again with text messages as evidence. Where's he talking about wanting to tackle female coworkers and bite them and shit.
It wasn't even really 10 cities. It was mostly just Houston, and he relied on the Cop's own stats.
exactly. these "people" just hate themselves so much, they look for r@cism where it doesn't exist.
