- Joined
- Jul 12, 2017
- Messages
- 522
- Reaction score
- 32
First, we all know that the size matters... always... period. But here is the question. Yesterday we had an interesting conversation with some friends and we have started to discuss in which striking combat sport the height and reach are biggest advantage.
As you can probably guess, we couldn't agree with each other. Everybody had a different view on the question. In boxing it is very hard to close the distance if you can't use many weapons like in other combat sports, but when you are close, your taller opponent can't maul you with knees for instance. In KB you might be kicked in the head, but you can still beat badly your taller opponent's legs. In MT the knees in the clinch can be a nightmare, but you can trip your taller opponent on the ground.
What is your opinion, guys?
As you can probably guess, we couldn't agree with each other. Everybody had a different view on the question. In boxing it is very hard to close the distance if you can't use many weapons like in other combat sports, but when you are close, your taller opponent can't maul you with knees for instance. In KB you might be kicked in the head, but you can still beat badly your taller opponent's legs. In MT the knees in the clinch can be a nightmare, but you can trip your taller opponent on the ground.
What is your opinion, guys?