- Joined
- Aug 7, 2015
- Messages
- 204
- Reaction score
- 94
True, but Anderson also had a 10x better striking game than Jones.
Uhhh I wouldn't go that far lol. Now if you had said reflexes, I might agree with you.
True, but Anderson also had a 10x better striking game than Jones.
He wasn't able to stop Chael's takedowns but he still finished him 2x.
Jones is miles ahead. Silva had 4 losses coming into the ufc and ended on a horrible streak. Jones has never lost, belts in 2 divisions, and fought better competition.
Yeah, we are on the same page.definitely not a "steroid blocker"
This has nothing to do with JJ, just general info. Clomid/clomiphene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), that in men can be used to increase your swimmer count and raise your natural testosterone serum level.
So, it can be a legit infertility treatment in men since it raises the swimmer count and boosts natural test production, where exogenous test can reduce your swimmers.
For PED users, it's mainly there to get your natural test production back up, and regulate estrogen. HCG is another that gets your balls back in order after a cycle, some use it during to keep them running normally.
Edit - I'm not a doctor, nor a pro, just sharing what I've learned during my own TRT adventures.
"Masking agent" has always irked me too lol. Could maybe see calling a diuretic that, but even those aren't "masking" anything, just diluting and maybe speeding up the purge.Yeah, we are on the same page.
The word I was looking for was "masking agent" which I am also not a fan of but it is what is often repeated in the media.
I have ranted that exact sentiment in the past."Masking agent" has always irked me too lol. Could maybe see calling a diuretic that, but even those aren't "masking" anything, just diluting and maybe speeding up the purge.
There's a lot of vernacular used by the media when talking PEDs that just doesn't really line up with what's really happening. I think that has some to do with the amount of misinformation that gets perpetuated, too.
Jones ain't undefeated though.
Overall, it’s not close and prime for prime, it’s still Jones by a comfortable margin. At his very best, Silva still had a glaring wrestling deficiency. There’s no clear path to victory against Jones and at his prime peak, before his toe snapped, he’s the closest we’ve seen to an unbeatable fighter.
I mostly agree with this but the one thing I would say in Anderson’s favor is that he dominated the two best middleweights of his era (Henderson and Franklin) a lot harder than Jones dominated the best LHW of his era (Cormier).
I also think that it’s very possible that Anderson would have won the LHW belt had Machida not come up when he did. If Anderson styles on whoever was champ at the time the way he did on Forrest, a lot of people probably have him number two all time instead of 3rd or worse (as is I think Aldo has a good argument for #3).
Jones obviously had the better career and the more well-rounded skill set, but prime-for-prime they were similarly dominant.
It's very wide.Jones is ahead but not by a big margin. They’re both goats in their own rights.
GSP resume is trash.Jones has pulled ahead of everyone in the GOAT debate imo but its not by much. Anderson, GSP, and Fedor are still on the same tier as Jones.
These "miles ahead" comments are just people that don't like Anderson.